Enabling GPIO+SPI mode support for nRF21540 - v2.8.0

[BenjaminGatti]

This page (v2.8.0) https://docs.nordicsemi.com/bundle/ncs-2.8.0/page/nrf/app_dev/device_guides/fem/fem_nrf21540_gpio_spi.html

Suggests copying the following into devicetree.

&pinctrl {

    spi0_default_alt: spi0_default_alt {

       group1 {

          psels = <NRF_PSEL(SPI_SCK, 1, 15)>,

                  <NRF_PSEL(SPI_MISO, 1, 18)>,

                  <NRF_PSEL(SPI_MOSI, 1, 16)>;

       };

    };

 

    spi0_sleep_alt: spi0_sleep_alt {

       group1 {

          psels = <NRF_PSEL(SPI_SCK, 1, 15)>,

                  <NRF_PSEL(SPI_MISO, 1, 18)>,

                  <NRF_PSEL(SPI_MOSI, 1, 16)>;

          low-power-enable;

       };

    };

 };

 

However, I get this error:

note the following errors:

devicetree error: C:/ncs/v2.8.0/zephyr/boards/nordic/nrf52840dk/nrf52840dk_nrf52811.dts:138 (column 59): parse error: expected number or parenthesized expression

I can clear this error by changing SPI_CLK to SPIM_CLK etc...

This suggests I have a definition for SPIM_CLK but I am missing SPI_CLK

The prj.conf includes:

CONFIG_MPSL=y

CONFIG_FEM_AL_LIB=y

CONFIG_MPSL_FEM_NRF21540_GPIO_SPI=y

It seems that documentation for enabling FEM is not sufficiently comprehensive or accurate to support success in v2.8.0
Is there an example project with nrf FEM support which is tested?

note the dtsi file (whatever that is or does) for this board includes:

SPIM and that hasn't the error. It would seem that SPI_SCK is not defined without some additional CONFIG perhaps?

Or SPI should be SPIM perhaps?

Thank you

[Sigurd Hellesvik]

BenjaminGatti said:

I was hoping someone would compile the solution in v2.9.0 and provide tested documentation.

Please consider prioritizing this request given there really is no tested documentation for the nrf21540 (+SPI) in the latest sdk.?

We are working on updating the documentation, but it will take some time.

BenjaminGatti said:

I am now able to compile this flag in v 2.9.0 for the 52811 (and 52840)

Good job! What did you do to make it work?

BenjaminGatti said:

flag triggers a memory error of some kind - maybe stack size error?

Some times just increasing stack size CONFIG_MAIN_STACK_SIZE fixes thing like this. Try that.

[BenjaminGatti]

I think the problem might be in the first post: the nrf52811 may only have a port 0 and not a port 1. the examples unfortunately for the 52840 do not transpose particularly well to the 52811, as there may also not be a spi3 in the nrf 52811. The example team may benefit from some encouragement to create samples for the small devices first - which will likely transpose without error to the larger chips.

If the documentation team needs any assistance on this, I can help.