Bluetooth init fails with error -11 after reset on nRF5340 (NCS v2.9.0)

Hi Nordic,

I encountered a strange issue when compiling and flashing my nRF5340 project with NCS v2.9.0.

  • On the first flash, everything works fine. Bluetooth starts successfully.

  • After I use VS Code "Reset" (without reflashing), the system reboots, but Bluetooth initialization fails with error -11.

Here are the logs for comparison:

First boot (works fine):

*** Booting nRF Connect SDK v2.9.0-7787b2649840 ***
*** Using Zephyr OS v3.7.99-1f8f3dc29142 ***
[00:00:01.415,557] <inf> usb_cdc_acm: Device suspended
[00:00:01.431,976] <inf> ADS1299_log: ADS1299 init success  62
[00:00:01.451,660] <inf> bt_hci_core: HW Platform: Nordic Semiconductor (0x0002)
[00:00:01.451,690] <inf> bt_hci_core: HW Variant: nRF53x (0x0003)
[00:00:01.451,721] <inf> bt_hci_core: Firmware: Standard Bluetooth controller (0x00) Version 45.41337 Build 3074452168
[00:00:01.487,152] <inf> bt_hci_core: No ID address. App must call settings_load()
[00:00:01.488,403] <inf> bt_hci_core: Identity: DA:97:F9:91:41:A4 (random)
[00:00:01.488,433] <inf> bt_hci_core: HCI: version 6.0 (0x0e) revision 0x206b, manufacturer 0x0059
[00:00:01.488,464] <inf> bt_hci_core: LMP: version 6.0 (0x0e) subver 0x206b
[00:00:01.488,525] <err> bt_gatt: Failed to save Database Hash (err -2)
[00:00:01.488,800] <inf> main_thread_log: BT addr: DA:97:F9:91:41:A4

Second boot (after reset, Bluetooth fails):

*** Booting nRF Connect SDK v2.9.0-7787b2649840 ***
*** Using Zephyr OS v3.7.99-1f8f3dc29142 ***
[00:00:01.511,138] <inf> usb_cdc_acm: Device suspended
[00:00:01.527,557] <inf> ADS1299_log: ADS1299 init success  62
[00:00:02.530,303] <err> bt_hci_driver: Endpoint binding failed with -11
[00:00:02.530,334] <err> bt_hci_core: HCI driver open failed (-11)
[00:00:02.530,364] <err> main_thread_log: Bluetooth init failed (err -11)

My questions:

  1. Why does Bluetooth initialization succeed after the first flash but fail with -11 after a reset? Is there any additional configuration required for reset handling on nRF5340?

  2. During the first boot, I also see:

    <err> bt_gatt: Failed to save Database Hash (err -2)

    What exactly does error -2 mean here? I have read in forum posts that this error might not affect usage — is this still the case with NCS v2.9.0, or should I configure settings/NVS properly to avoid it.

Thank you for your support!

Best Regards!

Ben

  • Add new found:

    I've found that the error doesn't seem to be caused by the reset itself. The error occurs if I don't open the RTT log (the VSCode view). If I open the log view after a reset, the logs appear normally.

    However, for normal factory programming, we cannot have the RTT viewer open. I tried using the nRF Programmer app to flash the firmware directly. After reset, the -11 error occurs.

  • Seems like with the logs there are some timing changes that gives the network core enough time to initialize.

    Can you set some delay before bt_enable in app core like k_sleep(K_MSEC(200)) and see if that helps? If it does, then we might change the priority of CONFIG_RPMSG_SERVICE_INIT_PRIORITY in prj.conf to see if this helps with network core being initialized a bit faster.

  • Hi Susheel,

    Thanks for your reply. I’ve observed a similar situation.


    Let me briefly explain how my previous program was executed: after the first reset, the system enters sleep mode, during which BLE is not enabled. BLE and the subsequent startup process are only activated when the system is woken up by a button press. The -11 error occurs at that moment.

    After a series of tests, I found that if I call bt_enable() immediately before system power off, the error no longer appears in the following process.

    Can you set some delay before bt_enable in app core like k_sleep(K_MSEC(200)) and see if that helps?

    This seems to be the opposite of your suggestion— in my case, calling bt_enable() earlier actually prevents the error.

    As a further question, is there a recommended or suggested time for calling bt_enable() on the nRF5340?

    Best Regards!

    Ben

Related