Enabling Provisioning

[rtphilipson]

I'm attempting to enable provisioning using attestation tokens in my project.  As soon as I add the config;

CONFIG_NRF_PROVISIONING=y

The build starts failing with;

C:\Users\RANDAL~1.PHI\AppData\Local\Temp\ccKWl0nJ.s: Assembler messages:
C:\Users\RANDAL~1.PHI\AppData\Local\Temp\ccKWl0nJ.s:1406: Error: missing expression

I'm building for a custom board, that has the nrf9151 on it.  Using SDK 3.1.1

now when I build the nrf_cloud_multi_service sample, targeting the nrf9151dk it builds fine, which I think means that I have some sort of CONFIG conflict.  

7271.prj.conf

[rtphilipson]

Perhaps you can tell me what I'm doing wrong;

nonsecure_storage:
address: 0xE4000
end_address: 0xfe000
orig_span: &id001
- nvs_storage
- user_storage
region: flash_primary
size: 0x1A000
span: *id001

nvs_storage:
address: 0xE4000
end_address: 0xF1000
inside:
- nonsecure_storage
placement:
align:
start: 0x1000
before:
- end
region: flash_primary
size: 0xD000

user_storage:
address: 0xF1000
end_address: 0xfe000
inside:
- nonsecure_storage
placement:
align:
start: 0x1000
before:
- end
region: flash_primary
size: 0xD000

I changed my pm_static to this, but when I try to use user_storage in my program it appears to be placing the memory at 0x100000 and only 4K of memory at that.  

[Syed Maysum Abbas Zaidi]

Hi,

Thanks for sharing the updated layout. The partition split itself looks fine.

If your data is ending up at 0x100000 with only 4 KB, that usually means the application is still writing to a default storage area, rather than the user_storage partition you defined. In other words, the partition exists, but the code isn’t actually using it yet.

Have you tried doing a pristine rebuild and checked build/partitions.yml to confirm if the user_storage is present at 0xF1000 with size 0xD000?

Best Regards,
Syed Maysum

[rtphilipson]

My bad, I was trying to create a nvs file system with more sectors than was available.  Instead of using 

FIXED_PARTITION_SIZE() to calculate, I was using a hardcoded value in my code .

So I appear to be all good now.