This post is older than 2 years and might not be relevant anymore
More Info: Consider searching for newer posts
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Gazell does not work with nrf 52832

Nice to meet you.

The chip uses nRF 52832. MDK keil μVision V 5.22.0.0 is used as the development environment.

Since I confirmed the operation with the sample project using the nRF 52 Development Kit, I am planning to develop nRF 52832 on my board.

I would like to use gazell to communicate between the master and slave, I have created a new project, but gazell's library does not work well.

I chose gzll and nrf_gzp in Manage Run-Time Environment and include "nrf_gzll.h"

nrf_gzll_init (NRF_GZLL_MODE_HOST);

If you try to run the program will not proceed any further. (I will paste the screen of the stopped place) image description Please teach me.

  • @Design10: I can see that all the Preprocessor Symbols are cleared, it's a not very good idea because some of our libraries base on these defines to work properly.

    I don't understand why you are using packs in the project. We stopped supporting pack from SDK v10.

    Which SDK version you based your application on ? please try to add the library files, and include paths into your project.

    You refer to how it's included in the gazell example, or your can start with the \examples\peripheral\template_project. There are lots of libraries included in the template project but you can remove the unused libraries to make it clean.

  • I knew that pack support was over for the first time.

    Since I would like to use SDK v13, I would like to develop library files by including them.

    I tried avoiding template_project as thought of PCA 10040 dependence, but I would like to exclude unnecessary libraries.

    Also, it seems there was a problem with the crystal of the custom board although it is the reason why gazell did not work in the last post. (It seems that switching from internal to external was not done well)

    Thank you for your answer.

Related