FIFO buffer clogging

[Pawel]

-----------------------------EDIT--------------------------------------

I've changed topic name, because not buffer overwrite is the problem.

I need some mechanism for checking if my data packet can fit into FIFO buffer. If not, it should be just lost. It has to be all or nothing. It is unacceptable to print just part of data. I've implemented such mechanism, but it requires changes in SDK files, which I have to avoid. How should I do this?

----------

Hello,

I have custom device based on nRF52832. It is scanning for ble devices and prints the data throught the uart using NRF_LOG.

When there is a lot of devices (~100), FIFO buffer overwrites and data coming throught the uart are corrupted.

void uart_init(void)
{


uint32_t err_code;

const app_uart_comm_params_t comm_params =
  {
	.rx_pin_no    = RX_PIN_NUMBER,
	.tx_pin_no    = TX_PIN_NUMBER,
	// .rts_pin_no   = RTS_PIN_NUMBER,
	// .cts_pin_no   = CTS_PIN_NUMBER,
	.flow_control = APP_UART_FLOW_CONTROL_DISABLED,
	.use_parity   = false,
	.baud_rate    = UART_BAUDRATE_BAUDRATE_Baud115200
  };

APP_UART_FIFO_INIT(&comm_params,
					UART_RX_BUF_SIZE,
					UART_TX_BUF_SIZE,
					uart_event_handle,
					APP_IRQ_PRIORITY_LOW,
					err_code);

APP_ERROR_CHECK(err_code);

uart_rx_buffer.p_data = malloc(UART_RX_BUF_SIZE);
memset(uart_rx_buffer.p_data, 0, UART_RX_BUF_SIZE);
uart_rx_buffer.size = 0;

app_uart_flush();
}

Enabling HWFC and increasing uart buffer does not help.

My temporary solution:

In app_uart_fifo.c change static app_fifo_t m_rx_fifo; and static app_fifo_t m_tx_fifo; to non static. Add this function to my code:

static __INLINE uint32_t fifo_length(app_fifo_t * const fifo)
{
  uint32_t tmp = fifo->read_pos;
  return fifo->write_pos - tmp;
}

Check if there is enough space in FIFO buffer to print next data packet:

    uint32_t available_count = m_tx_fifo.buf_size_mask - fifo_length(&m_tx_fifo) + 1;
    if (available_count > rc)
    {
        NRF_LOG_PRINTF("%s", msg);
 }

How can I prevent FIFO overwrites without changing the SDK? I prefer lost some data instead of recive corrupted data.

nRF52832

SDK11

SoftDevice s132