Hi all,
when I insert ble_nus into mesh_gatt . I realized there are two pulse functions with the same function:
void ble_nus_on_ble_evt(ble_evt_t const * p_ble_evt, void * p_context) { if ((p_context == NULL) || (p_ble_evt == NULL)) { return; } ble_nus_t * p_nus = (ble_nus_t *)p_context; switch (p_ble_evt->header.evt_id) { case BLE_GAP_EVT_CONNECTED: on_connect(p_nus, p_ble_evt); break; case BLE_GATTS_EVT_WRITE: on_write(p_nus, p_ble_evt); break; case BLE_GATTS_EVT_HVN_TX_COMPLETE: on_hvx_tx_complete(p_nus, p_ble_evt); break; default: // No implementation needed. break; } }
and
void mesh_gatt_on_ble_evt(const ble_evt_t * p_ble_evt, void * p_context) { switch (p_ble_evt->header.evt_id) { case BLE_GAP_EVT_CONNECTED: connect_evt_handle(p_ble_evt); break; case BLE_GAP_EVT_DISCONNECTED: disconnect_evt_handle(p_ble_evt); break; case BLE_GATTS_EVT_WRITE: write_evt_handle(p_ble_evt); break; case BLE_GATTS_EVT_HVN_TX_COMPLETE: tx_complete_handle(p_ble_evt->evt.gatts_evt.conn_handle); break; /* TODO: The following events should be handled by an SDK module/the application. */ case BLE_GATTS_EVT_SYS_ATTR_MISSING: { uint32_t err_code = sd_ble_gatts_service_changed(p_ble_evt->evt.gatts_evt.conn_handle, m_gatt.handles.service, m_gatt.handles.service); /* Those errors can be expected when sending trying to send Service Changed indication * if the CCCD is not set to indicate. Thus set the returning error code to success. */ NRF_MESH_ASSERT((err_code == NRF_SUCCESS) || (err_code == BLE_ERROR_INVALID_CONN_HANDLE) || (err_code == NRF_ERROR_INVALID_STATE) || (err_code == NRF_ERROR_BUSY)); NRF_MESH_ERROR_CHECK(sd_ble_gatts_sys_attr_set(p_ble_evt->evt.gatts_evt.conn_handle, NULL, 0, 0)); break; } case BLE_GAP_EVT_DATA_LENGTH_UPDATE_REQUEST: { ble_gap_data_length_params_t dl_params; memset(&dl_params, BLE_GAP_DATA_LENGTH_AUTO, sizeof(dl_params)); NRF_MESH_ERROR_CHECK(sd_ble_gap_data_length_update(p_ble_evt->evt.gap_evt.conn_handle, &dl_params, NULL)); break; } case BLE_GAP_EVT_SEC_PARAMS_REQUEST: NRF_MESH_ERROR_CHECK(sd_ble_gap_sec_params_reply(p_ble_evt->evt.gap_evt.conn_handle, BLE_GAP_SEC_STATUS_PAIRING_NOT_SUPP, NULL, NULL)); break; case BLE_GAP_EVT_PHY_UPDATE_REQUEST: { ble_gap_phys_t const phys = { .rx_phys = BLE_GAP_PHY_AUTO, .tx_phys = BLE_GAP_PHY_AUTO, }; NRF_MESH_ERROR_CHECK(sd_ble_gap_phy_update(p_ble_evt->evt.gap_evt.conn_handle, &phys)); break; } case BLE_GATTS_EVT_EXCHANGE_MTU_REQUEST: exchange_mtu_req_handle(p_ble_evt); break; case BLE_GATTS_EVT_SC_CONFIRM: break; default: break; } }
if they let them coexist , when I use nrf_connect connect and use mesh_app connect , It jump to 2 function , and I only want , if I connect to nus , it jump to ble_nus_on_ble_evt , If I connect to proxy , It jump to mesh_gatt_on_ble_evt . Is this feasible? Can you give me advice ? Thank !!!