Maximum number of connections over BLE for close working devices

[Ars Morozov]

Hello. I'm doing research for new project, regarding with BLE and WIFI capabilities to connect big amount of device to one host. I should choose between WIFI and BLE. I need to have a stable connection with 30 moving pairs of peripheral devices in range around 150 meters in the line of sight outdoor conditions. Devices inside each pair will be close to each other. WIFI not discussed here, so my question about BLE. 

If I select BLE, I see this solution.
So, each pair will have peripheral and multirole devices. Host device will be main central. Peripheral devices will be connected to multirole (here multirole device is client). Multirole devices will be connected to main central as peripheral (here multirole device is server).
NRF52840 with Softdevice S140 is the best solution from hardware point of view for multirole and for main central. Softdevice S140 support 20 concurent connections, so I should place 2 NRF52840 to get 30 connections on host. So, how do you think is it possible to build described here system and have stable data transmition from peripheral pairs to host? 

In this system will be 60 connections. BLE have 40 channel (and 3 for advertising). Is it possible to have a more than one connections on one channel for close working devices?

To ease of understanding I drew this on attached figure. Hope this help to understand what I mean.

Also if you have any other ideas and suggestions to development of described system I will gladly get to know them 

Thanks in advance.

[awneil]

I was thinking of other manufacturer's SoCs ...

[Ars Morozov]

Espressif ESP?:)

[awneil]

the point is that it's all down to the laws of physics - so it applies irrespective of manufacturer

[Ars Morozov]

Hello Overbekk,

ovrebekk said:

Do you have any particular latency or throughput requirements?

Yes, I have some requirement, but as experience tell me, it's easy for BLE. Latency of delivering from each pair to main central should be less than 2 seconds, throughput  from each pair to main central is less then 150 bytes/s. 

ovrebekk said:

Combining a lot of links is not an issue unless you need to push a lot of data. You will get occasional packet collisions, but BLE is designed to handle a fair bit of packet loss without the link breaking down. 

ovrebekk said:

If you use Nordic devices with Bluetooth 5 support on all sides you can leverage the new CSA#2 feature, which makes each device use a more random channel selection scheme. The advantage of this is that if you have a packet collision between two device pairs they are very unlikely to collide again on the next packet attempt, and they should be able to coexist nicely. 

ovrebekk said:

One potential issue here is if the two nRF52840 devices on the central side are placed very close together. Then they might interfere with each other even if they are using different channels, as a strong TX signal can block out a receiver if it is strong enough. The two nRF52840's would not be synchronized, and will at some point try to send packets at the same time. 

Hm, everything is sounds really good, but problem with placed together two nRF52840 is critical issue... So here I see two potential ways to solve this trouble: 
1) To extend number of possible concurent connections. But is it possible? It's a softdevice limit, but is it possible to do something with that?
2) Synchronize two placed close nrf52840, but how to do it? 

Which direction is more perspective? And also give please me some information to start more deep learning about selected way, if it possible.

Thanks in advance.

[Ars Morozov]