Peer Manager vs Device Manager

[Chris]

I'm developing an application to support multiple concurrent central-and-peripheral connections. It's a bit messy but is just about working. At the moment I'm using SDK 9.0.0 and the Device Manager.

I noticed in SDK 10 there is a new peer manager. The release notes say: "Added an experimental module named Peer Manager. This module will eventually replace the existing Device Manager. The new Peer Manager improves on the Device Manager in multiple ways, mainly by supporting concurrent central and peripheral connections."

It sounds like the new PM might be better suited to my application, but the fact it's described as "experimental" makes me wonder about its reliability. Is it recommended to migrate to the PM for new designs or stick to the Device Manager?

[Einar Thorsrud]

As stated in the documentation, the Peer Manager is currently in experimental state and is not recommended for production. However, if it fits better with your needs I would consider going for the Peer Manager, depending on the situation. It should not matter that the Peer Manager is classified as experimental, as long as it is stable in your application. Moreover it may be that a non-experimental release will become available before you launch your product.

The experimental BLE Relay Example demonstrates how to use the Peer Manager.

[Siddharth rana]

Hello Einar thorsrud

How can one impliment static passkey with GLS example 

[Einar Thorsrud]

Hi,

Please create a new question as this is not related to the original question.