nRF52832, nRF5340 current consumption comparison

It is an extension of the ticket below.
devzone.nordicsemi.com/.../nrf5340-current-consumption-issues
I'd like to find out what causes the huge difference in current consumption on the two boards.

An online power profiler (OPP) was used to estimate the radio current, and PPK2 was used to measure the actual current consumption of the board.

<52832>




OPP: 77uA
Measurements: 72.23 uA
Measurement_base: 3.04 uA

<5340>




OPP: 56uA
Measurements: 85.87 uA
Measurement_base: 6.76 uA

OPP simulations suggest that the 5340 will have lower current consumption, but measurements do not.
Comparing the currents over one connection interval clearly shows the difference. Both radio/idle the 5340 has high current consumption.

<52832>



Interval (60 ms): 70.28 uA
Peak (5 ms): 809.6 uA
Base (55 ms): 3.06 uA

<5340>



Interval: 78.53 uA
Peak: 870.45 uA
Base: 6.54 uA

I'd like to know where this difference comes from.
Is it simply because the 5340 has two cores?
52832, IDDFLASHCACHEDCDC: 3.7 mA
5340, IAPPCPU3 + INETCPU2: 3.6 mA + 2.6 mA = 6.2 mA

I tried to compare the current consumption of the two mcu peripherals in the datasheet, but the 5340 doesn't provide enough information. (gpiote, pof...)
I want to make sure I've achieved sufficient current optimization.

Parents
  • Hi John,

    Unfortunately, we don't find anything that immediately stands out. Could you please give us some details about what application you used to get the nRF5340 measurement? We can try to replicate it.

    Also, am I right to understand that you don't have a concern about the estimation and actual measurement of the nRF52832?

    Hieu

  • The 52832 board is in production and assumes proper power optimization has been made.
    We are using 5340 for new project and we are optimizing towards 52832 boards.

    It's not clear if the same optimizations were applied.
    Rather, it's something I'd like to check out.
    I applied power optimization by referring to the Nordic blog,
    I'm new to NCS so maybe there's something I'm missing.
    (As noted in the previous ticket, the 52832 uses nRF52 SDK 17.1.0 and the 5340 uses NCS 2.3.0.)

    Is it possible with the 5340 to achieve the same level of power consumption as the 52832?
    I need to check if it consumes higher power because of the physical (electrical) characteristics of the MCU or if there is an optimization that I did not apply.

    Provides the config file from the 5340 project build.
    Please make sure I have configured proper optimizations.
    config_230816.zip

Reply
  • The 52832 board is in production and assumes proper power optimization has been made.
    We are using 5340 for new project and we are optimizing towards 52832 boards.

    It's not clear if the same optimizations were applied.
    Rather, it's something I'd like to check out.
    I applied power optimization by referring to the Nordic blog,
    I'm new to NCS so maybe there's something I'm missing.
    (As noted in the previous ticket, the 52832 uses nRF52 SDK 17.1.0 and the 5340 uses NCS 2.3.0.)

    Is it possible with the 5340 to achieve the same level of power consumption as the 52832?
    I need to check if it consumes higher power because of the physical (electrical) characteristics of the MCU or if there is an optimization that I did not apply.

    Provides the config file from the 5340 project build.
    Please make sure I have configured proper optimizations.
    config_230816.zip

Children
No Data
Related