Does ncs 2.5.0 implement the workaround for TWIM timing spec anomaly 219?

[tellg]

Does ncs 2.5.0 implement the suggested workaround for https://docs.nordicsemi.com/bundle/errata_nRF52840_Rev3/page/ERR/nRF52840/Rev3/latest/anomaly_840_219.html ?

If not, will it be implemeted later?

[Håkon Alseth]

Hi,

 

Unfortunately, this is not implemented in the nrfx_twim drivers and should be overridden in the application space.

I will suggest internally that this should be handled for the driver setup on nRF52840.

 

Kind regards,

Håkon

[tellg]

Do you have a formula or register value available for setting the TWIM I2C frequency to e.g. 380 kHz in the FREQUENCY register (to make some headroom)?

We are using a https://www.ti.com/product/LDC1612 which seems to be very sensitive when being close to 400 kHz

The anomaly workaround works most of the times, but on some very few boards, 390 kHz is still too fast, but we do not want to go as far as down to 250 kHz

BTW: our I2C bus pullups are 3K3

[Håkon Alseth]

Hi,

 

Thanks for updating.

Your code is good for specifically i2c0, but if you use other instances, you also need to remember to update the "twim" pointer.

One option can be to do something like in the driver:

https://github.com/nrfconnect/sdk-zephyr/blob/v3.4.99-ncs1-1/drivers/i2c/i2c_nrfx_twim.c#L226

 

Then you can access the register similar to this:

https://github.com/nrfconnect/sdk-zephyr/blob/v3.4.99-ncs1-1/drivers/i2c/i2c_nrfx_twim.c#L234

 

Not strictly needed to this scenario, but just something to consider if you're using other i2c instances.

 

Kind regards,

Håkon

[tellg]

Thank you

My only comment is that one cannot use nrf_twim_frequency_set as it only accepts enums of type nrf_twim_frequency_t

[Håkon Alseth]

Understood. I was thinking about the direct register access through "dev_config->twim.p_twim", which allows you to write to the .FREQUENCY member.

 

Kind regards,

Håkon

[tellg]

Also the  i2c_nrfx_twim_config struct is declared in a .c file, so not accessible

[Håkon Alseth]

Yes, you're right. My apologies!