Using high precision measurement in Nordic Distance Toolbox

[Dymek117]

Hey,

I watched webinar with presentation of NDT and a Lidar as a reference data and if looks quite impressive for high precision calc method.
We are using 7002 DK and we would like to really see how it works. Currently we did some testing for IFFT method from nrf-sdk samples, but as it was said in webinar these result are not trustworthy for wide measurement ranges.

However, i haven't seen example usage of nrf_dm_high_precision_calc() function in sdk, or github.
I know that there is a need of calling nrf_dm_populate_report but i still fail using this with sdk 2.5.0.
Could you maybe share a piece of code, where you present how to properly use these tools for high precision distance measurement?
It could be for other target or SDK version, i just need a start point.It could be the code, that you use for webinar measurement with roll camera :)

We are eager to test it and try to auto-map 5x5 nrf device matrix in large space with coodrdinates, but for this purpose we need as precise result as possible.
Of course, we could share our results of this experiments.

Thanks!

[Elfving]

Dymek117 said:

What I'm gonna do is exactly what you described - use high precision if available and IFFT in other case.

Understood. Switching to one of the regular results if high precision doesn't work sounds like a good idea, but keep also in mind what I said about mixing results and using them in the situation they are best. IFFT with something like a median 3 filter does perform okay though.

Dymek117 said:

I'm going to do some openspace test and some other with walls in between. Hopefully it will be good enough. 

Scenarios with no line-of-sight and possibly a with paths that goes around walls being the strongest path measured, are typical scenarios that are quite difficult to handle when doing distance estimation.

Dymek117 said:

Is it regular situations on devkits? I tried to move away from any other signal sources. Maybe there is something wrong in my setup, shouldn't I use some external antenna, etc?

I haven't tested this over various distances with the DK myself. Of course it might be that you get better results with an optimized external antenna. 

Having a look at the SINR indicators themselves instead of the lack of a result might help you out.

If there are many SINR indicators that are not "HIGH" the high precision algorithm will do poorly and instead return NaN. The indicators are part of the `nrf_dm_report_t`, so it would be possible to just overwrite the values of all of the indicators to be https://github.com/nrfconnect/sdk-nrfxlib/blob/main/nrf_dm/include/nrf_dm.h#L41, before calling https://github.com/nrfconnect/sdk-nrfxlib/blob/main/nrf_dm/include/nrf_dm.h#L379. This might give poor results though.

Regards,

ELfving

Regards,

Elfving