BLE_ERROR_NO_TX_BUFFERS appears at low signal

[IvanD]

Hello,

I've created own characteristic and send it from proprietary board acting as peripheral to the Client in form of notifications. I use sd_ble_gatts_hvx() function for this purpose. I have connectionInterval set to 20ms and a sensor which generates data for characteristic with 50Hz data rate. It means that in general I have 1 new data packet to send per each BLE connection event. And all is working ok when RF signal is strong.

When the RF signal is low (happens when distance is big or objects are between) but the connection is still stable, sd_ble_gatts_hvx() function starts giving me BLE_ERROR_NO_TX_BUFFERS error. When signal restores, all becomes good ok.

It seems like when the signal is low the packet buffer is not released from old packets or some procedure starts sending own packets filling the buffer completely. As the result I can not send any new data packets until signal is good again.

Can someone explain me what is the reason of such strange behavior? Because I thought notifications are to be sent in any case and weak signal would just lead to increased packet loss.

P.S. I am using S110, SDK 10, nRF51822.

[RK]

It's because at the low signal strength you are losing packets / getting errors on the link and the packets getting lost need to be retransmitted until they get through. The buffers are held until the packets all go through obviously as the data is needed to be retransmitted.

You're not quite right about notifications. Yes they are unacknowledged and not guaranteed to be sent, or passed along by the receiving end, however the link they go over, the Logical Link layer, is a guaranteed, in order, reliable connection. So once a notification packet gets there, it will be constantly retried until it's sent, in order. The LL is reliable.

Moreover, Nordic's implementation of notifications also promises that if it accepts a packet for notification (ie doesn't return the buffer full error) it will send it to the link layer and from there it will get to the other side (unless the connection fails totally). ie this implementation doesn't decide, after it's accepted a packet but not yet sent it out on the link layer (at which point the LL protocol requires it be retried until success) it won't later decide to drop it before sending it.

So all you're seeing is BTLE having to retry lots of times to get packets sent and you have to wait until they are before you can use the buffer.

[IvanD]

Understood. Thank's.