Hi,
I am wondering whether I can easily get Packet Reception Ratio in nRF54L15?
Hi,
I am wondering whether I can easily get Packet Reception Ratio in nRF54L15?
Hi,
I am not sure which physical (PHY) parameter you are specifically after here, but direct_test_mode can provide information related to the RX PHY evaluation.
radio_test can also be setup in such a mode.
Kind regards,
Håkon
Thank you so much for your information!
Happy to help out! please let me know if you run into any issues or have questions.
Kind regards,
Håkon
Hi,
I just find some time to test the radio_test but there is no result telling me the PRR, does it mean I need to check the pattern by myself and caluculate the PRR?
In addition, I use the radio_test to test the throughput of the BLE_2Mbits code, I transmit the default 256 bytes packet in one minutes and calculate. The result (1899383.467bps) is different from the Bluetooth: Throughput (1396017bps). Is this because the radio_test eliminated the influence of the header?
Another question would be what is the difference between 4MBIT_BT_0_6 and 4MBIT_BT_0_4,the result is close around 3.8Mbits, what is the difference between BT=0.6 and 0.4? When would it be available for practical use?
The trend I get is like this
Thank you so much for your help!
Hi,
I just find some time to test the radio_test but there is no result telling me the PRR, does it mean I need to check the pattern by myself and caluculate the PRR?
In addition, I use the radio_test to test the throughput of the BLE_2Mbits code, I transmit the default 256 bytes packet in one minutes and calculate. The result (1899383.467bps) is different from the Bluetooth: Throughput (1396017bps). Is this because the radio_test eliminated the influence of the header?
Another question would be what is the difference between 4MBIT_BT_0_6 and 4MBIT_BT_0_4,the result is close around 3.8Mbits, what is the difference between BT=0.6 and 0.4? When would it be available for practical use?
The trend I get is like this
Thank you so much for your help!