NRF9161 based LTE-M tracker data drops while moving – can it be optimized?

[marsal]

Hi everyone,

I’m using a custom board (a tracker) that can travel at speeds up to 65 km/h and transmits data regularly every 200 ms. I expect, therefore, that the inactivity timer should not be activated. While the device is in motion, I’m seeing intermittent data gaps ranging up to several seconds, which is unacceptable for our application.

Could this be caused by non-optimal cell-handover settings? I’ve attached a few logs below for reference.

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Martin

 

Three log fragments examples, related to data send drops:

 

17:31:57.179 +CSCON: 0

17:31:57.230 <inf> main: RRC mode: Idle

17:31:57.276 +CEREG: 1,"04D3","0DBC2351",7,,,"11100000","11100000"

17:31:57.298 <inf> main: Cell update, cell tac: 1235, cell id: 230433617

17:31:57.371 +CSCON: 1

17:31:57.429 <inf> main: RRC mode: Connected

17:31:57.539 +CSCON: 0

17:31:57.568 <inf> main: RRC mode: Idle

17:31:57.907 +CSCON: 1

17:31:57.926 <inf> main: RRC mode: Connected

***

17:37:54.095 +CEREG: 1,"04D3","0DC18750",7,,,"11100000","11100000"

17:37:54.154 [00:54:10.770,263] <inf> main: Cell update, cell tac: 1235, cell id: 230786896

***

17:38:05.373 +CEREG: 1,"04D3","0DDD4350",7,,,"11100000","11100000"

17:38:05.434 <inf> main: Cell update, cell tac: 1235, cell id: 232604496

***

 

Modem firmware: mfw_nrf91x1_2.0.2

 

Current 9161 modem initiation sequence is:

 

AT+CFUN=0

AT%XSYSTEMMODE=1,0,0,0

AT+CPSMS=0

AT+CEDRXS=0

AT%RAI=0

AT+CSCON=1

AT+CEREG=5

AT+CFUN=1

[Achim Kraus]

marsal said:

I’m seeing intermittent data gaps ranging up to several seconds, which is unacceptable for our application.

marsal said:

5 Hz to an MQTT broker

You chose MQTT. That usually queues the messages and transmit them, when transmission is possible. So, there may be a short gap in the time-stream, but not the data-stream, that's just delayed. If you add the "sensor-time" to the data, you will also be able to have the time-stream available with delays.

I guess, you need to adapt your application to that common practice.

[marsal]

Thanks, well, my interval_between_two_subsequent_successful_mqtt_sends is between 210ms and 300ms in case that there are no cell updates, which is OK for me. When cell update comes, it raises to e.g. 1.5 sec. So the cell update seems really be the case.

Er, I am struggling just now to catch the modem trace... Not sure if UART or RTT approach is better for me. 2.6.3.

[marsal]

Indeed, we are already in communication with our cell provider and they are promising to optimize the network for us :-). Possibly another option is to try DECT NR+ instead of LTE-M + and a gateway having also an LTE modem!?

[dejans]

Hi,

marsal said:

Possibly another option is to try DECT NR+ instead of LTE-M + and a gateway having also an LTE modem!?

Can you provide details how you intend to use this setup?

Best regards,
Dejan

[marsal]

Thanks, here is the idea - this means a rework of the current setup, of course:

10 to 20 trackers in one race  + 1 gateway. Distance between trackers and gateway can be up to 1km, direct line of sight. If not enough for the data transfer, an "intermediate" node is expected to be positioned somewhere in the middle between the gateway and the more distant place of the race.

Trackers (using our current hardware, btw ;-),  ):
a) Sending to the gateway each 200ms data about position/speed/direction (approx 100 bytes each)
b) Receiving from gateway each 1 second GNSS correction RTK data (up to 1KB each second, same for each tracker)
Idea: trackers typically communicate with gateway, if the gateway is not reachable for a tracker and vice versa, they send/receive via another tracker (mesh).

Gateway (our current hardware + LTE modem rework):
a) receiving position/speed/direction data from trackers, sending it to an MQTT server via LTE (I guess not via LTE-M for this case)
b) receiving RTK corrective data from another server and sending them to trackers via DECT NR+
c) Some other communication (AGNSS, some controls)

So, any hints and DECT NR+ firmware to test this warmly welcomed.

Thank you!

Martin

[dejans]

Hi Martin,

Thank you for providing additional information.

We will discuss this internally. I will get back to you during next week.

Best regards,
Dejan

[marsal]

Thanks, dejans,
one question regarding the current setup: are you please aware of an implementation with LTE-M NRF9161 where the handover goes smoothly? Which carrier provider?
Thx!