nF9151 pinout differences between spec sheet and evkit schematic

We are currently implementing the 9151 SIP into our design, and we am noticing some discrepancies between the datasheet and the evkit schematic. I am hoping you can help us understand why the evkit and datasheet seem to conflict with each other and how we should connect 9151 in our design.
  1. Pins 15 and 40 are named RESERVED but are connected to GND in the EVKIT schematic. In the datasheet they are named GND. I think the evkit pin naming is wrong. We will connect them to GND.
  2. Evkit schematic shows pins 93-96 are named GND and connected to GND. In the datasheet they are named RESERVED and instructed to leave the pins NC. Should we connect pins 93, 94, 95, 96 to GND or leave NC?
  3. Pins 31-32-33 are named NC in the evkit schematic and are not connected. In the spec they are named RESERVED and they need a thermal connection according to the note. Does the evkit actually connect these thermally? How much thermal output should we plan for?
  4. Pin 81 is named NC in the evkit, but it is named RESERVED in the spec. This appears to only be a naming issue in the evkit.

Is there an updated spec or evkit schematic that resolves these apparent discrepancies?

Parents
  • Pins 15 and 40 are named RESERVED but are connected to GND in the EVKIT schematic. In the datasheet they are named GND. I think the evkit pin naming is wrong. We will connect them to GND.

    Pin 15 and 40 are is internally grounded

    Evkit schematic shows pins 93-96 are named GND and connected to GND. In the datasheet they are named RESERVED and instructed to leave the pins NC. Should we connect pins 93, 94, 95, 96 to GND or leave NC?

    These are internal test points and shall be NC. All the small pads under the module shall be NC (81 to 104)

    Pins 31-32-33 are named NC in the evkit schematic and are not connected. In the spec they are named RESERVED and they need a thermal connection according to the note. Does the evkit actually connect these thermally? How much thermal output should we plan for?

    The note just means that the pins should be soldered to a pad like all the other pads on the module.

    Pin 81 is named NC in the evkit, but it is named RESERVED in the spec. This appears to only be a naming issue in the evkit.

    See #2

Reply
  • Pins 15 and 40 are named RESERVED but are connected to GND in the EVKIT schematic. In the datasheet they are named GND. I think the evkit pin naming is wrong. We will connect them to GND.

    Pin 15 and 40 are is internally grounded

    Evkit schematic shows pins 93-96 are named GND and connected to GND. In the datasheet they are named RESERVED and instructed to leave the pins NC. Should we connect pins 93, 94, 95, 96 to GND or leave NC?

    These are internal test points and shall be NC. All the small pads under the module shall be NC (81 to 104)

    Pins 31-32-33 are named NC in the evkit schematic and are not connected. In the spec they are named RESERVED and they need a thermal connection according to the note. Does the evkit actually connect these thermally? How much thermal output should we plan for?

    The note just means that the pins should be soldered to a pad like all the other pads on the module.

    Pin 81 is named NC in the evkit, but it is named RESERVED in the spec. This appears to only be a naming issue in the evkit.

    See #2

Children
No Data
Related