BLE reliability and range for safety-critical alert transmission (>60 m, sub-second latency)

Hi there!

We are currently evaluating a low-power BLE system for a safety-critical wearable application that must transmit immediate alerts to a nearby receiver or mobile device.

Our requirements are roughly:


Range: stable communication at >70 m (open field) between two BLE devices, but often used also in an urban surrounding where the range should be at least around 30,
Latency: alarm message delivery within <1 s
Reliability: minimal packet loss or false-negatives, even in dynamic environments (body movement, multipath, partial obstruction, etc.)

We would appreciate your insight or thoughts on the following points:

  1. What is the realistic maximum reliable range for BLE (1M vs Coded PHY) in such scenarios?

  2. How stable is BLE signal transmission under moderate body shadowing or environmental attenuation (e.g. when one device is worn on the wrist)?

  3. Would you consider BLE sufficiently robust for a critical alert link, or would you recommend an alternative approach (e.g. proprietary 2.4 GHz, Sub-GHz, or hybrid)?

  4. Is there a specific Nordic chip which would you recommend for a safety-critical set up?

Many thanks in advance for your advice!

All the best,
Kai
Kai

Parents
  • Hi Kai

    I personally don't have experience with sub-GHz approaches like this, so I can't speak for it being more or less reliable than BLE. I focus on the 2.4GHz band I'm afraid.

    The only sub-GHz SiP series we have is the nRF91 series, but that is a LTE-M/NB-IoT based technology and not the best for low latency AFAIK. I think contacting the Nordic sales representative of your area will have a better idea on what is the best fit for your use case to be honest. Let me know if you need help contacting the regional sales manager of your area and I will help you out with that.

    Best regards,

    Simon

Reply
  • Hi Kai

    I personally don't have experience with sub-GHz approaches like this, so I can't speak for it being more or less reliable than BLE. I focus on the 2.4GHz band I'm afraid.

    The only sub-GHz SiP series we have is the nRF91 series, but that is a LTE-M/NB-IoT based technology and not the best for low latency AFAIK. I think contacting the Nordic sales representative of your area will have a better idea on what is the best fit for your use case to be honest. Let me know if you need help contacting the regional sales manager of your area and I will help you out with that.

    Best regards,

    Simon

Children
Related