Guidance on Using PSM vs Complete Power-Off for Ultra-Low Power IoT Application (nRF9151)

Hello Nordic Support Team,

We are currently developing an IoT product using the nRF9151. In our application, the device wakes up once per day, transmits a small amount of data to the server, and then returns to a low-power state for the remainder of the day.

Our current understanding is that the nRF9151 consumes approximately 2.7 µA while in PSM mode. Therefore, one possible approach is to keep the modem in PSM for the rest of the time after data transmission.

However, we are also considering an alternative approach where we completely cut the power to the nRF9151 after transmission and power it on again only when the device needs to send data the next day.

We would like your guidance on which approach is recommended for optimal battery life and system reliability:

  1. Keeping the modem in PSM mode for the entire idle period (~24 hours).

  2. Completely removing power from the module and powering it on once per day before transmission.

From our observations, a full power cycle requires around 20–30 seconds for modem initialization, SIM initialization, network search, and network attachment, whereas waking from PSM appears significantly faster.

Could you please advise which approach is generally recommended for ultra-low-power IoT devices with very infrequent transmissions (once per day)? Additionally, are there any impacts on network registration, battery consumption, or modem longevity that we should consider when choosing between these two approaches?

  • Hi Shashikant,

    A couple of questions that may help clarify the scenario:

    Is the device stationary or moving during operation?

    How would you describe the network conditions where the device is deployed (good coverage vs. poor coverage)?

    In addition, could you clarify which power modes you are currently using or considering on the board? Some designs make use of different system-level low-power states (sleep or deep sleep).

    Also, just to confirm: I assume you are using LTE-M or NB-IoT, and not NTN connectivity. Could you confirm this?


    Best regards,
    Federica from OWL Services

  • Hello,

    ''Could you please advise which approach is generally recommended for ultra-low-power IoT devices with very infrequent transmissions (once per day)? ''

    PSM is approach you should follow.

    As you are doing complete shutdown, I would like to say it's only better when you keep the device off for at least a week maybe.

    You can read this Power saving techniques and can look at dev academy course Cellular IoT Fundamentals - Nordic Developer Academy 

  • Hello Federica 

    Thanks for reply !!!

    Is the device stationary or moving during operation?

    A Device is stationary.

    How would you describe the network conditions where the device is deployed (good coverage vs. poor coverage)?

    The device will be deployed in a poor or challenging network environment such as a basement or remote location where signal strength may be weak or unstable.”

    In addition, could you clarify which power modes you are currently using or considering on the board? Some designs make use of different system-level low-power states (sleep or deep sleep).

    Currently, the device operates in a low-power architecture where the cellular module wakes up once per day to transmit data. After transmission, the module enters PSM (Power Saving Mode) to minimize power consumption. During PSM, the current consumption is around a few microamps(2.7uA as per datasheet)

    Also, just to confirm: I assume you are using LTE-M or NB-IoT, and not NTN connectivity. Could you confirm this?

    Yes, the device is designed to use LTE-M / NB-IoT cellular connectivity. We are not using NTN (Non-Terrestrial Network) connectivity.

Related