nRF54L15 DK ENG-A - Official hello_world hex jumps to empty flash after working previously

Device: nRF54L15 DK (PCA10156, S/N 1057762414)
Chip: NRF54L15_xxAA_ENGA (engineering sample A)
NCS: v3.4.0 · nRF Connect: v5.3.2 · J-Link: V9.24a (on-board OB)


Problem summary:
The pre-built nrf54l15dk_hello_world.hex from nRF Connect Quick Start was working fine, then stopped. Now it produces no serial output and Serial output timed out or did not receive expected value. A custom blinky sample shows identical behavior.


What I've done / ruled out:

  1. Full chip recover (nrfutil device recover, equivalent to nrfjprog --recover) — re-flashed hello_world afterwards. Did NOT fix.
  2. UICR verified factory default  0xFFFC00 all 0xFFFFFFFF. No APPROTECT lock.
  3. No Secure Domain / IronSide / boot-mode issues — nrfutil confirms: Device family nRF54l does not have different boot modes, IronSide SE boot report is not defined for this device.
  4. FLPR core not running (pc=0x2, RRAM empty). No interference from co-processor.
  5. The hello_world hex IS correctly written to flash — verified by comparing vector table at 0x0 with the hex file byte-by-byte: SP=0x200011E0, Reset=0x00000D25, all match.

Evidence — CPU jumping to empty flash:

I sampled cpuapp PC 10× after flashing hello_world. The PC values are:

0x24F42, 0x2F868, 0x112E0, 0x2F860, 0x2F868, 0x2F868
0x24F38, 0x24F38, 0x24F26, ...

The nrf54l15dk_hello_world.hex covers addresses 0x0 – 0x6372 (25,458 bytes).
All sampled PCs are far beyond the hello_world code range:

Sampled PC Offset from 0x6372 Flash content at that address
0x112E0 +0xAF6E (44KB past end) 0xFF (empty)
0x24F26-0x24F42 +0x1EBB4 (123KB past end) 0xFF (empty)
0x2F860-0x2F868 +0x294EE (165KB past end) 0xFF (empty)

J-Link mem8 reads confirm flash at these addresses is all 0xFF. No HardFault (CFSR=0, HFSR=0). The CPU is executing garbage 0xFFFF… opcodes in empty flash — it never reaches printk() / main().


Key observation: This hex was working on the same board earlier (serial output appeared, Quick Start passed). It stopped working during a debugging session that involved J-Link flash/erase operations (but no UICR writes, no APPROTECT changes, no OTP burns — verified).

Question: Has anyone seen an nRF54L15 ENG-A sample where the Zephyr startup code jumps to a wrong address in empty flash, even after a full recover and re-flash of the correct hex? Could this be a known anomaly of the ENG-A stepping, or a flash integrity / SRAM initialization issue specific to early silicon?


Full log of evidence collected (register dumps, PC traces, hex verification) available on request.

Parents
  • Hello,

    The engineering A revision was only made available to customers who were enrolled into the early sampling program and is no longer suitable for development. It had a number known limitations and requiring workarounds that we are not including in our current SDK releases. Please get a new board with the current silicon revision (https://docs.nordicsemi.com/r/bundle/comp_matrix_nrf54l15/page/comp/nrf54l15/nrf54l15_ic_revision_overview.html). 

    Best regards,

    Vidar

  • Hi Vidar,

    Thank you for the clarification regarding the engineering A revision. Understood — that explains the inconsistencies we were seeing against the current SDK, and we'll move off the A revision going forward.

    Before we scrap the board entirely, I'd like to explore one more option: is it feasible to repair our existing DK by desoldering the A-revision nRF54L15 and replacing it with the current silicon revision on the same PCB? The rest of the board (power tree, RF front-end, debug MCU, sensors) is intact — only the main SoC was damaged in our case.

    A few specific questions to help us decide:

    1.Pin/footprint compatibility — Is the current revision nRF54L15 a drop-in replacement on the A-revision DK PCB, or has the package/footprint changed?
    2.Companion component changes — Are there any other BOM changes on the DK that must accompany the SoC swap (e.g., decoupling caps, crystal/load caps, external flash variant, DC/DC inductor) to bring it fully in line with the current revision reference design?
    3.Official guidance — Does Nordic officially support a chip-level swap, or do you strongly recommend replacing the full DK? 

    Thanks in advance for your time.

    Best regards,

    Lionel

  • Hi Lionel,

    I understand that you would like to make use of this DK if possible. Unfortunately, there have been several changes to the matching network and reference design since this initial revision, so I cannot guarantee that replacing the IC will work. It will likely function, but you may experience reduced performance or stability issues.

    Best regards,

    Vidar

Reply
  • Hi Lionel,

    I understand that you would like to make use of this DK if possible. Unfortunately, there have been several changes to the matching network and reference design since this initial revision, so I cannot guarantee that replacing the IC will work. It will likely function, but you may experience reduced performance or stability issues.

    Best regards,

    Vidar

Children
No Data
Related