This post is older than 2 years and might not be relevant anymore
More Info: Consider searching for newer posts

UARTE STOPRX on exact byte

Hi there,

I'm issuing a STOPRX at a specific time but I'm noticing that more bytes are being put into the buffer from after the STOPRX was issued.

Is there a way to stop the UARTE on the exact byte and process, and receive all bytes from that point on to a different buffer?

Please advise.

UPDATE

After triggering a STOPRX, the UARTE will hang around for a few more bytes, placing them in the same buffer and then calling ENDRX. This is problematic since these new bytes are part of a different message.

image description

Here you can see that STOPRX is triggered during some small idle times, yet the ENDRX doesn't happen till much later.

This results in ENDRX being called with 11, 6 and 1 bytes read (when it should be 6, 6 and 6 bytes read)

Parents
  • No. The documentation addresses this. if you're using nRF52 (UARTE so I assume so) up to 4 bytes can be received after the STOPRX task. How many actually are depends on what's on the other end transmitting data to you, if it's slow stopping after the RTS signal is deactivated and keeps sending more data, the UARTE is going to receive it. I assume you're using hardware flow control.

    Those bytes however go into the RX FIFO so you can update the memory buffer pointer after you get the ENDRX event and then flush to start those bytes off in your new buffer.

  • I do not know how many bytes will be in a message beforehand, that is decided by that small finite idle time of 1.5ms. So I end up with 11 bytes read in my buffer but I have no idea where in those 11 bytes the STOPRX was actually triggered.

    Again, you mention (along with the manual) that it will continue to receive up to 4 bytes after a STOPRX as long as they are sent immediately after and in succession. Yet you can see from the oscilloscope capture the last STOPRX task is triggered after the last byte, but it's still taking a 4 bytes delay.

Reply
  • I do not know how many bytes will be in a message beforehand, that is decided by that small finite idle time of 1.5ms. So I end up with 11 bytes read in my buffer but I have no idea where in those 11 bytes the STOPRX was actually triggered.

    Again, you mention (along with the manual) that it will continue to receive up to 4 bytes after a STOPRX as long as they are sent immediately after and in succession. Yet you can see from the oscilloscope capture the last STOPRX task is triggered after the last byte, but it's still taking a 4 bytes delay.

Children
No Data
Related