Triks for keeping BLE connection robust.

[Valer_I]

Hello all, at present time I'm making investigation of BLE link stablility at harsh megapolis environment and at long open space ranges. During testing I found out some information and collected some questions.
The setup is: Proprietary device based on nRF518222 + S110 v.8 softdevice. The NUS service configgured to notify some data each second. The connection parameters were: ConnInterval: 30ms, SlLatency: 34, SupervisionTimeout: 10000ms.

The sniffer capturing shown:

1. Peripheral sends empty pdu packet without considering that recently notification PDU was sent to central. So slave latency counter functionality in S110 do not monitor other outgoing packets? Why? It drains the battery what is the gain ?

2. At long distances the slave latency counter seem to be disabled and S110 peripheral send the empty PDU at each connection event. What RSSI threshold (in dbm) is set in Softdevice to start link reinforcement.

3. Any RSSI averaging algorithm in Softdevice before passing value through the BLE_GAP_EVT_RSSI_CHANGED event?

The brief manual on how to hold the BLE link as long as possible by means of Nordic's SoC would be appreshiated.

Edit: Sniffer_cap_link_test.pcapng

[Hung Bui]

Hi Valer,

1. Please provide the sniffer trace. Please be aware that you set the preferred connection parameter to have slave latency of 34 doesn't mean you have it as 34. It's the central who decide what will be used in the connection.

2. What do you mean by this "start link reinforcement" ?

3. RSSI is calculated on every packet receives. You can configure some parameter with sd_ble_gap_rssi_start() such as the threshold and the skip_count.

"How to hold the BLE link as long as possible" ? The more frequently you transfer packets (with or without data) the better the link can be kept. Also longer connection timeout would help avoid the link being terminated. The trade off is more power consumption because of short interval and lower response time when the connection timeout is large, also we waste more power listen to the central when the link is terminated unexpectedly.

[Valer_I]

Ok, for Core spec it is clear. The " "The more frequently..." also clear. Now for sniffer cap:

1. My initial question #1, please see pkt num 840, the peripheral sends notification and it was quite clear for me that softdevice would set slave latency counter to 0. But we see Empty pdu pkt #842. Why it was sent by peripheral?

2)Pkt #15154 and the next. We can see many Empty PDU packets from slave. At that time thew link was wery weak. They are sent by link layer for retransmissions or the slave latency counter disabled by some "weak link trigger". What trigger?