This post is older than 2 years and might not be relevant anymore
More Info: Consider searching for newer posts

SOFTDEVICE_HANDLER_INIT

Hi,

I´ve been reading a lot of question about the duration of the SOFTDEVICE_HANDLER_INIT, and I've found that if a change the accuracy of the calibration it will be faster.

I'm using a PCA10040, with S132 12.1, and the accuracy that i was using in the project was NRF_CLOCK_LF_XTAL_ACCURACY_20_PPM, that I've found in the PCA10040.h. So I've tried to define the clock_lf_cfg, using NRF_CLOCK_LF_XTAL_ACCURACY_250_PPM, and calling the SOFTDEVICE_HANDLER_INIT, as the code below:

nrf_clock_lf_cfg_t clock_lf_cfg = {.source = NRF_CLOCK_LF_SRC_XTAL, .rc_ctiv = 0, .rc_temp_ctiv = 0, .xtal_accuracy = NRF_CLOCK_LF_XTAL_ACCURACY_250_PPM};

// Initialize the SoftDevice handler module.
SOFTDEVICE_HANDLER_INIT(&clock_lf_cfg, NULL);

But I've got the same delay.

When I've called the softdevice init this way:

SOFTDEVICE_HANDLER_INIT(NRF_CLOCK_LF_XTAL_ACCURACY_250_PPM, NULL);

the time to initialize was way better.

So what is the difference?

Best Regards.

Parents Reply Children
No Data
Related