• State Verified Answer
  • Replies 7 replies
  • Subscribers 73 subscribers
  • Views 3954 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Attachments (0)
Nordic Case Info
  • Case ID: 120000
Options
This post is older than 2 years and might not be relevant anymore
More Info: Consider searching for newer posts

Sniffer + Wireshark Throughput

radioschmadio

Long time reader first time poster upper.

I am working on a very minimal BLE send / receive scheme for a research project, and am not using a SoftDevice. I have written my own driver to send a packet, and am monitoring the packets being sent through a BLE sniffer connected to windows 8 and wireshark. I am experiencing a phenomena I cant quite figure out. Here goes:

I am sending an advertising packet on channel 37 every 8.875 m/s.

The packet has a 1 byte counter in it that I am monitoring.

My time between wireshark packets received is .187896s

Thus, I am missing around 20-21 tx'ed packets between received packets in wireshark.
The counter in the advertising data between packets received in wireshark increments around 20-21 as well.

I have a GPIO pin toggling every time a packet is sent which I am monitoring on the scope, so I fairly sure that the hardware is sending out a packet every 8.875 ms. Thus, I am guessing this is a sniffer / wireshark issue.

Any ideas of why I would be have this throughput issue?

If its a sniffer issue, can anyone recommend a pro BLE packet sniffer? (I need to monitor raw network packets and am doing my own post processing).

Thank you in advance.

Parents
  • 0

    Nordic nRF51 BLE sniffer software is not open source so we don't know how precisely it works. The obvious limitation is that only one nRF5x chip can listen to only one radio channel at the time so there is some hoping routine in the sniffer software which tries to capture all adv. packets on all 3 channels and that can be different then your broadcasting pattern. Btw. there are other commercial BLE sniffers which have more sophisticated radio designs (e.g. 4 chips/antennas;) and they can observe all channels at the time but they cost in range of thousands of USD;) So for 40 bucks you have pretty decent sniffer on Nordic DK and you need to accept some limitations... There are other open source variants such as Ubertooth which might help you but not on nRF5x chips. My assumption is that if you are able to write transmitting FW you will succeed in writing the listening as well;)

Reply
  • 0

    Nordic nRF51 BLE sniffer software is not open source so we don't know how precisely it works. The obvious limitation is that only one nRF5x chip can listen to only one radio channel at the time so there is some hoping routine in the sniffer software which tries to capture all adv. packets on all 3 channels and that can be different then your broadcasting pattern. Btw. there are other commercial BLE sniffers which have more sophisticated radio designs (e.g. 4 chips/antennas;) and they can observe all channels at the time but they cost in range of thousands of USD;) So for 40 bucks you have pretty decent sniffer on Nordic DK and you need to accept some limitations... There are other open source variants such as Ubertooth which might help you but not on nRF5x chips. My assumption is that if you are able to write transmitting FW you will succeed in writing the listening as well;)

Children
No Data
Related
Terms of service