This post is older than 2 years and might not be relevant anymore
More Info: Consider searching for newer posts

nRF52840 HFCLK

What kind of high frequency clock source is less current 'hungry', internal RC or external XO? I can not find any information in nRF52840 product specification?

It is possible to provide CPU core with 16 MHz or 32 MHz instead of 64 MHz for saving power consumption?

Parents
  • Hi,

    Q1: What kind of high frequency clock source is less current 'hungry', internal RC or external XO?

    A1: The internal RC uses less power, but the RC clock accuracy is much lower compared to using a crystal. If you are using BLE/Radio peripheral, you have to use an external crystal with a frequency tolerance of max 40 ppm.


    Q2: It is possible to provide CPU core with 16 MHz or 32 MHz instead of 64 MHz for saving power consumption?

    A2: You can only run the CPU at 64MHz. Using a 64MHz clock will execute your tasks faster and overall you wont save power reducing the clock speed. We chose not to implement a clock divider because we found 64MHz to be most effective in terms of current consumption.

Reply
  • Hi,

    Q1: What kind of high frequency clock source is less current 'hungry', internal RC or external XO?

    A1: The internal RC uses less power, but the RC clock accuracy is much lower compared to using a crystal. If you are using BLE/Radio peripheral, you have to use an external crystal with a frequency tolerance of max 40 ppm.


    Q2: It is possible to provide CPU core with 16 MHz or 32 MHz instead of 64 MHz for saving power consumption?

    A2: You can only run the CPU at 64MHz. Using a 64MHz clock will execute your tasks faster and overall you wont save power reducing the clock speed. We chose not to implement a clock divider because we found 64MHz to be most effective in terms of current consumption.

Children
No Data
Related