This post is older than 2 years and might not be relevant anymore
More Info: Consider searching for newer posts

How to monitor several beacons in an open area with one Hub.

Hi.

We are a Norwegian company trying to create a prototype to monitoring people. We are already waiting our BLE 5 with ANT capabilities to start creating the prototype. But we are right now having a hard time to find the right and best device to monitor all the beacons. Do you have any idea or suggestion of what we could use as a hub, reader/receiver for all those beacons we want to deploy in a open space area? The Hub/reader need to be able to handle 50 to 100 beacons at a time, ant this reader/hub is the only device connected to the main PC by ethernet. We plan to extend and improve the options, like 2 way comunication and other type of sensors. But for now only we could get the beacons send a small amount of date to position them (triangulate) in an area that will have several Hubs/readers so we can triangulate them, but each hub/reader needs to be able to handle from 50 to 100 beacons at on time.

Parents
  • If you didn't want ANT, I'd suggest a Raspberry PI (or the new RPi Zero W if you can use Wifi instead of Ethernet) but I don't think any of the RPi board have ANT (though you should check)

    Apart from that, I suspect your next best option is to attach a nRF52 to a RPi as a SPI slave, and have the nRF52 handle the monitoring, and use the RPi for transmission via Ethernet to wherever the data is needed.

    If you are willing to write the drivers, you could directly connect an Ethernet module to the nRF52. But I suspect for a prototype it would probably be easier to use the RPi for the Ethernet connection.

    Edit.

    BTW. Triangulation via RSSI is extremely inaccurate. There are multiple posts on this forum about using RSSI for distance measurement and triangulation and I have never seen one where anyone got it to work well.

  • Hi Vikindio, all what I've found about Pixie seems to work with >5m accuracy (e.g. here they claim 10-45m which seems to be perfectly in-line with BLE RSSI experience from such basic solutions). Do you have more details explaining how ANT mesh, BT5.0 mesh, nRF52840 and location tracking relates to each other in your solution? So far it doesn't make much sense and it prevents us to give you more specific answers. Also as far as I know nRF52840 is just preview (= pre-production) version with pretty extensive anomaly list and poor SW support. Full production versions should come in the end of 2017, I'm wondering if this influences your project...

Reply
  • Hi Vikindio, all what I've found about Pixie seems to work with >5m accuracy (e.g. here they claim 10-45m which seems to be perfectly in-line with BLE RSSI experience from such basic solutions). Do you have more details explaining how ANT mesh, BT5.0 mesh, nRF52840 and location tracking relates to each other in your solution? So far it doesn't make much sense and it prevents us to give you more specific answers. Also as far as I know nRF52840 is just preview (= pre-production) version with pretty extensive anomaly list and poor SW support. Full production versions should come in the end of 2017, I'm wondering if this influences your project...

Children
No Data
Related