Hi,
What is an optimal transmission power to maximize the coded PHY range, but still stay within ETSI regulations? Can nRF52840 actually exceed the regulations if I set the transmission power accidentally too high? Currently, I have set it 8.
Hi,
What is an optimal transmission power to maximize the coded PHY range, but still stay within ETSI regulations? Can nRF52840 actually exceed the regulations if I set the transmission power accidentally too high? Currently, I have set it 8.
Hello slowhand
From what I can see in ETSI EN 300 328 V2.1.1, ETSI sets an upper limit for non-adaptive equipment using Frequency hopping spread spectrum of 20dBm EIRP (100mW).
That is, with output power from the chip and gain from antenna combined. The nRF52840 can achieve a maximum of 8dBm, and its antennas have close to 0 dBi gain, meaning even with the output power set to maximum you should be well below the limit set by ETSI.
EDIT:
Your comment got me thinking and I conferred with a colleague. ETSI does in fact not define BLE as FHSS but as Direct Spread Spectrum (DSSS) due to the advertising channels, so it goes under the "other wide band modulation" section. The maximum output power is still the same for non-adaptive equipment, 20 dBm EIRP, but there is an additional power spectral density requirement as you said of 10mW/MHz. If I'm not completely off here, as each channel in BLE is 2MHz wide the nRF52840 should still be well within the specifications.
The Bluetooth 4.2 specification limits the output power to 10 dBm, and our previous chips had 4dBm maximum output power. In Bluetooth 5 that limit is raised to 20 dBm, and the nRF52840 is the first chip with 8dBm output power.
Best regards
Jørn Frøysa
Hello slowhand
From what I can see in ETSI EN 300 328 V2.1.1, ETSI sets an upper limit for non-adaptive equipment using Frequency hopping spread spectrum of 20dBm EIRP (100mW).
That is, with output power from the chip and gain from antenna combined. The nRF52840 can achieve a maximum of 8dBm, and its antennas have close to 0 dBi gain, meaning even with the output power set to maximum you should be well below the limit set by ETSI.
EDIT:
Your comment got me thinking and I conferred with a colleague. ETSI does in fact not define BLE as FHSS but as Direct Spread Spectrum (DSSS) due to the advertising channels, so it goes under the "other wide band modulation" section. The maximum output power is still the same for non-adaptive equipment, 20 dBm EIRP, but there is an additional power spectral density requirement as you said of 10mW/MHz. If I'm not completely off here, as each channel in BLE is 2MHz wide the nRF52840 should still be well within the specifications.
The Bluetooth 4.2 specification limits the output power to 10 dBm, and our previous chips had 4dBm maximum output power. In Bluetooth 5 that limit is raised to 20 dBm, and the nRF52840 is the first chip with 8dBm output power.
Best regards
Jørn Frøysa
Thanks Jørn!
Good to hear that the value 8 is "legal" in Europe. I recall there was also a spectral density rule of 10mW/1MHz, but not sure if that applies/affects here.
Btw, did something happen with the 1Mbps mode since BT4.2? I mean I recall testing 1Mbps LE some years ago and the signal did not fly as far it does with nRF52840's 1Mbps mode. Not sure what the tx power was in the old test, though.
Ok, thanks again!
