State Not Answered
Replies 12 replies
Subscribers 67 subscribers
Views 8707 views
Users 0 members are here

Attachments (0)

Nordic Case Info

Case ID: 125128

Options

This post is older than 2 years and might not be relevant anymore
More Info: Consider searching for newer posts

Impact of Blueborne vulnerability?

Craig Listor over 7 years ago

Just announced today is the Blueborne vulnerability. ARMIS Blueborne What is the impact to nRF development from this vulnerability?

Top Replies

Sigurd over 7 years ago +1

Hi, Under "What Devices Are Affected?" , it's mentioned that products/wearables using Bluetooth Low Energy is not affected. Since the only Bluetooth solution Nordic support is Bluetooth Low Energy(and…
Carles over 7 years ago +1

The Nordic SoftDevice does not implement the Service Discovery Protocol (SDP), since that is a BR/EDR protocol not used in BLE.
Carles over 7 years ago +1

SDP is a service discovery protocol used in BR/EDR and not used in BLE (since ATT fulfils that role in BLE). SDUs are Service Data Units, the largest L2CAP packet data unit, and they are used by the SoftDevice…

Parents

0 KingOfTheNorth over 7 years ago

See the detail behind the L2CAP vulnerability in the white paper.

Is the L2CAP protocol layer part of the Nordic BLE implementation? If so, what guarantee is there that the vulnerability demonstrated in the BlueZ stack implementation doesn't also affect the Nordic stack?
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel

Reply

0 KingOfTheNorth over 7 years ago

See the detail behind the L2CAP vulnerability in the white paper.

Is the L2CAP protocol layer part of the Nordic BLE implementation? If so, what guarantee is there that the vulnerability demonstrated in the BlueZ stack implementation doesn't also affect the Nordic stack?
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel

Children

No Data

Related