How to receive BLE_EVT_TX_COMPLETE faster?

[Chocol8]

Greatings!

I am sending a packet with data in it from my custom board with nrf51822 to my android phone using cahnged ble_app_uart. The packet is being sent 8 times before I receive event BLE_EVT_TX_COMPLETE. Is it possibile to reduce time for receiving BLE_EVT_TX_COMPLETE or could you suggest how to wait for this event so I would not be sending 8 packets? This is where I set event flag:

case BLE_EVT_TX_COMPLETE:
        ble_tx_complete = 1;					
	    break;

Is device is connected I am sending a string while I will get an event flag:

if( m_conn_handle != BLE_CONN_HANDLE_INVALID ) // BLE is connected. Do service routine.
	 {					
	  if(ble_tx_complete == 0) 
	    {
	      sprintf((char*)siusti_plnasete0,"H:%.2f T:%.2f",BME280_humidity,BME280_temperature);
	      ble_nus_send_string(&m_nus,siusti_plnasete0,20);
            }
	 }

This is how it looks in nrf_uart app:

I have tried this way but then phone do not receive that packet at all:

 if( m_conn_handle != BLE_CONN_HANDLE_INVALID ) // BLE is connected. Do service routine.
    	 {					
    	
    	      sprintf((char*)siusti_plnasete0,"H:%.2f T:%.2f",BME280_humidity,BME280_temperature);
    	      ble_nus_send_string(&m_nus,siusti_plnasete0,20);
                 while(ble_tx_complete == 0) 
    	       {
                   }
    	 }

Any suggestions?

-----------------------EDIT----------------------------------------------- This is real time trace from wireshark:

I use s110 (7.0.0), I can not find which SDK example I took. Is there a way to find from which sdk it was taken somewhere in a project? But I believe its one of 5,6 or 7.

[run_ar]

Not sure I understand the problem here. But why would you use the tx_complete event to determine when to send another packet? I.e. If you only want to send the packet once, you should only call the sd_ble_gatts_hvx one time. The packet is buffered in the SD until it's received by the peer or the connection is disconnected.

If you want to send one packet per connection event you could use radio notifications to let your application know when to prepare the next packet.

If you want to send data as fast as possible, just loop through your date until the Softdevice buffers are full (7 or 6 if you sent packets in the previous connection event.)

[Chocol8]

@run_ar Thank you for helping me out. yes, I thought of this. But the thing is that later on I am planning to send comands from master device. This way peer must receive and decode them.

@endnode thank you for your contribution and explaining this in detail. No, I do not have any reason for using old stack. I will try s130 on my spare and compare. Right now I understand that I can not receive TX_complete event. I used this because I was not aware of other ways to notify cpu when a data packet was received.

Could you, guys, explain me how to use sd_ble_gatts_hvx to notify cpu that a packet was received, so it proceed further?