Hi all,
I would like someone give me a suggestion about timers.
in my current approvement I am using an RTC timer with 32k crystal to control my sleep times it is power efficient and accurate, but limited if I want to use micro seconds interruptions.
I need to generate delays for 5us for a custom protocol to transfer data, I could use nrf_delay_us function, but it will keep the CPU running. it worth implement a TIMER for such delay?
I also tried to port the code from Timer example to my code (it uses softdevice) I am using the TIMER1 as far I see. but it is not working properly
#include <stdbool.h> #include <stdint.h> #include "nrf.h" #include "nrf_drv_timer.h" #include "bsp.h" #include "app_error.h" const nrf_drv_timer_t TIMER_LED = NRF_DRV_TIMER_INSTANCE(1); void timer_led_event_handler(nrf_timer_event_t event_type, void* p_context) { static uint32_t i; uint32_t led_to_invert = ((i++) % LEDS_NUMBER); switch (event_type) { case NRF_TIMER_EVENT_COMPARE0: bsp_board_led_invert(led_to_invert); break; default: //Do nothing. break; } } void Start_timer(void) { uint32_t time_ms = 500; //Time(in miliseconds) between consecutive compare events. uint32_t time_ticks; uint32_t err_code = NRF_SUCCESS; //Configure all leds on board. bsp_board_leds_init(); //Configure TIMER_LED for generating simple light effect - leds on board will invert his state one after the other. nrf_drv_timer_config_t timer_cfg = NRF_DRV_TIMER_DEFAULT_CONFIG; err_code = nrf_drv_timer_init(&TIMER_LED, &timer_cfg, timer_led_event_handler); APP_ERROR_CHECK(err_code); time_ticks = nrf_drv_timer_ms_to_ticks(&TIMER_LED, time_ms); nrf_drv_timer_extended_compare( &TIMER_LED, NRF_TIMER_CC_CHANNEL0, time_ticks, NRF_TIMER_SHORT_COMPARE0_CLEAR_MASK, true); nrf_drv_timer_enable(&TIMER_LED); }
talking in efficiency what is better nrf_delay_us(5) vs use TIMER1 for 5us delay
I also was wondering if is possible set a value to the RTC counter to control when it overflow, for example if it is working at 8 bit, set 250, ant it will overflow every 5 ticks
Thanks