OTA DFU speed / Bonbed OTA DFU with nrfutil

[roland.schenk]

I' m using the nRF51 Dongle (PCA10031) for the evaluation of the OTA DFU bootloaders of SDK15.0.0 with the NRF52840 PDK.
Using the PC tool nRFConnect V2.3.2 with the App Bluetooth Low Energy V2.1.0 the download speed is much higher than using nrfutil (V3.5.1) dfu ble -ic NRF51 -pkg dfu_app_test.zip -p COM4 -n "DfuTarg" -f.
I have seen, that nRFConnect is using Connectivity firmware V1.2.2 with 1Mbit/s on the nRF51 Dongle, while nrfutil is using Connectivity firmware V1.2.0 with 115,2kbit/s.

Is there a possibility to speed up the download with nrfutil?

A other question to OTA DFU with a bonded target device with nrfutil:
The first OTA DFU with bonds ist working fine with nrfutil. But if I try to program the same target device a second time, it won't work.

Is there a possibility to use bonded OTA DFU with nrfutil repeatedly on the same target device?

Best regards
Roland

[Bjørn Kvaale]

This devzone case could be useful for you. As the last link & this link state: the easiest solution is to lower the connection interval in the nrfutil code to increase the dfu speed.

Regarding your second question, this should definitely be possible. Just beware that if you are updating the bootloader, you need to follow the validation rules posted under the subsection "Acceptance rules for version" in this link. The reason is that the new FW version needs to be > than old FW version for the bootloader. For the application, it is >=. 

[roland.schenk]

To the question about OTA DFU upload speed:
I have made some additional measurements for an application upload of 42KBytes:
PC nRF Connect:               45s
PC nrfutil:                             60s
Android nRF Connect         6s

With the nRF sniffer I observed the uploads and I have seen, that  PC nRF Connect always uses 10ms connction interval, and PC nrfutil uses 15ms connection interval, even if the max. connection interval is set t0 10ms.
With nRF sniffer I have seen, that the real fast upload with the android nRF Connect is realized by setting the MTU size to 247. On PC nRF Connect and nrfutil this is not done.

Looking at the python source code of nrfutil, I found in dfu_transport_ble.py that the MTU size is only increased if the nrf_sd_ble_api_ver is >= 3. In my case the pc_ble_driver_sd_api_v2 is used.

How is it possible to use pc_ble_driver_sd_api_v3 with increased MTU size with nrfutil and the nRF51 Dongle (PCA10031)?

[Bjørn Kvaale]

It is unfortunately not possible to use pc_ble_driver_sd_api_v3 on the nrf51 dongle. The last version supported for the nrf51 is the v2.