Hi there,
We have the application running on STM32 and we talk to connectivity chip ( nrf 52810) using serialization.
Now, I have to save bonding information on my STM32 (various reason). So I can rule out the use of Peer Manager.
Satbir
Hi there,
We have the application running on STM32 and we talk to connectivity chip ( nrf 52810) using serialization.
Now, I have to save bonding information on my STM32 (various reason). So I can rule out the use of Peer Manager.
Hi,
You serialize softdevice api, so sd_ble_gap_sec_params_reply() and sd_ble_gap_sec_info_reply() should not differ from other softdevice api calls and events.
I do for instance believe \nRF5_SDK_15.2.0_9412b96\examples\ble_peripheral\ble_app_hrs\pca10040\ser_s132_uart show usage of sd_ble_gap_sec_params_reply() and sd_ble_gap_sec_info_reply().
Best regards,
Kenneth
Hi,
You serialize softdevice api, so sd_ble_gap_sec_params_reply() and sd_ble_gap_sec_info_reply() should not differ from other softdevice api calls and events.
I do for instance believe \nRF5_SDK_15.2.0_9412b96\examples\ble_peripheral\ble_app_hrs\pca10040\ser_s132_uart show usage of sd_ble_gap_sec_params_reply() and sd_ble_gap_sec_info_reply().
Best regards,
Kenneth
Thanks Kenneth,
It worked, I realized that I missed a few flags