Migrating a design from Raspberry pi Zero to nRF9160 DK - Need I2C and SPI interfaces

[RodWatt]

Hi,

I have developed a simple system based around a Raspberry Pi Zero. The system uses a couple of sensors to measure temperature and water pressure using a ADS51115 A/D and a MAX 31865 RTD to digital convertor. These connect to the Pi zero via the !2C bus and the SPI interface. I would like to replace the Pi zero with the nRF9160 dev board, can some one point me to some example hw and sw that will enable me to quickly convert. Thanks, Rod

[Jan Tore Guggedal]

Hi, RodWatt

In order to use SPI and I2C peripherals, the following configurations can be placed in `prj.conf` to enable them and select the nrfx driver:

CONFIG_I2C=y
CONFIG_I2C_NRFX=y
CONFIG_I2C_2=y
CONFIG_I2C_2_NRF_TWIM=y

CONFIG_SPI=y
CONFIG_SPI_NRFX=y
CONFIG_SPI_3=y
CONFIG_SPI_3_NRF_SPIM=y

This will enable I2C instance 2 and SPI instance 3, configure them to use nrfx driver. Note that these are the ones declared in the default secure boot to be available for a non-secure application:
https://github.com/NordicPlayground/fw-nrfconnect-nrf/blob/master/samples/nrf9160/secure_boot/src/main.c#L321

You can choose other instances as long as you also adjust which peripherals are set as non-secure.

You then need to defined the peripherals in an overlay file for the board where you can set the pin numbers and clock speed. Name it `nrf9160_pca10090.overlay` and place it in the application folder. The contents of the file may be as follows:

&i2c2 {
        status = "ok";
        sda-pin = <30>;
        scl-pin = <31>;
        clock-frequency = <I2C_BITRATE_FAST>;
};

&spi3 {
        status = "ok";
        sck-pin = <6>;
        mosi-pin = <7>;
        miso-pin = <8>;
        spi-max-frequency = <4000000>;
};

The devices get the labels "I2C_2" and "SPI_3" to be used in the `device_get_binding()` call, according to their instance numbers.

When you have the configuration set, you will be able to use the generic I2C and SPI drivers in Zephyr, and can build use those samples and the API documentation as reference:

I2C API:
https://docs.zephyrproject.org/latest/api/io_interfaces.html?#i2c-interface

SPI API:
https://docs.zephyrproject.org/latest/api/io_interfaces.html?#spi-interface

Samples:
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/tree/master/samples/drivers 

[RodWatt]

Jan, thank you for your reply. A couple  of follow on questions.

1. Am I correct in saying that I can assign any GPIO pins as SPI and I2C interfaces?

2. As part of my development process, I want to phase in the replacement of the Raspberry Pi. In the next version on the prototype, I would like to keep the Pi zero and add the nRF9160DK effectively as a peripheral. 

So, please can you advise how I can add the nRF9160DK as a peripheral to the Pi. Do I just connect over UART or can you suggest a better way?

[Jan Tore Guggedal]

1. In general, yes, any GPIO can be used. Some pins have dedicated functionality on the dev kit which is shown in a table on the back of the kit, so you might want to avoid them as a convenience, but they’re usable if you need them.
   
   
2. UART, I2C, SPI etc should work fine. Note that some peripherals share the same addresses, as shown by having the same peripheral ID in this table, so that needs to be kept in mind:
   https://www.nordicsemi.com/DocLib/Content/Product_Spec/nRF9160/latest/memory#topic

[Jeff Seaman]

Did you get the SPI to function on the nRF9160 I have done the setup and ried running a version of the sample code.  I do get a device pointer back, but when I try to write to the SPI device I do not see any activity on the pins, I am looking fro the clock signal as a first step the I would connect a AT25SF041-SSHD flash memory chip for testing.  Also I was not seeing in the sample code where the chip select lins was asserted.

[Martin Lesund]

Hi Jeff,

I see that you have made a new case regarding this, great!
We will follow up your issue there.

[RodWatt]

Hi Jan,

Finally I have had the opportunity to get back to this. (Im doing this work as a side line!) Anyway, I have Zephyr now running on the board and have verified my tool chain with the standard hello World example. Next, I want to try my first sensor, the BME280. I was pleased to see there is already example code there. I added the overlay fine as you suggested above. Please can you tell me what the proper syntax is for defining the sensor. I get the error below. I guess I need to define the sensor either in my config or overlay file? Sorry, I appreciate this is quite basic stuff, Im a h/w guy in a s/w world!

Watts-MacBook-Pro:build Watt$ ninja

[102/109] Building C object zephyr/drivers/sensor/bme280/CMakeFiles/drivers__sensor__bme280.dir/bme280.c.obj

FAILED: zephyr/drivers/sensor/bme280/CMakeFiles/drivers__sensor__bme280.dir/bme280.c.obj 

ccache /Users/Watt/gnuarmemb/bin/arm-none-eabi-gcc -DBUILD_VERSION=v1.14.0-rc1-1246-g959abdf1c9c9 -DKERNEL -DNRF9160_XXAA -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -D__ZEPHYR_SUPERVISOR__ -D__ZEPHYR__=1 -I../../../../kernel/include -I../../../../arch/arm/include -I../../../../include -I../../../../include/drivers -Izephyr/include/generated -I../../../../soc/arm/nordic_nrf/nrf91 -I../../../../soc/arm/nordic_nrf/include -I../../../../lib/libc/minimal/include -I../../../../ext/hal/cmsis/Include -I../../../../ext/hal/nordic/nrfx -I../../../../ext/hal/nordic/nrfx/drivers/include -I../../../../ext/hal/nordic/nrfx/hal -I../../../../ext/hal/nordic/nrfx/mdk -I../../../../ext/hal/nordic/. -isystem /Users/Watt/gnuarmemb/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/7.3.1/include -isystem /Users/Watt/gnuarmemb/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/7.3.1/include-fixed -Os -nostdinc -g -Wall -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-format-zero-length -imacros /Users/Watt/zephyrproject/zephyr/samples/sensor/bme280/build/zephyr/include/generated/autoconf.h -ffreestanding -Wno-main -fno-common -mthumb -mcpu=cortex-m33 -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-pie -fno-pic -fno-strict-overflow -Wno-pointer-sign -Wno-unused-but-set-variable -fno-reorder-functions -fno-defer-pop -Werror=implicit-int -Wpointer-arith -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -mabi=aapcs -march=armv8-m.main+dsp -std=c99 -MD -MT zephyr/drivers/sensor/bme280/CMakeFiles/drivers__sensor__bme280.dir/bme280.c.obj -MF zephyr/drivers/sensor/bme280/CMakeFiles/drivers__sensor__bme280.dir/bme280.c.obj.d -o zephyr/drivers/sensor/bme280/CMakeFiles/drivers__sensor__bme280.dir/bme280.c.obj   -c /Users/Watt/zephyrproject/zephyr/drivers/sensor/bme280/bme280.c

In file included from /Users/Watt/zephyrproject/zephyr/drivers/sensor/bme280/bme280.c:24:0:

/Users/Watt/zephyrproject/zephyr/drivers/sensor/bme280/bme280.h:111:2: error: #error "BME280 device type not specified"

 #error "BME280 device type not specified"

  ^~~~~

/Users/Watt/zephyrproject/zephyr/drivers/sensor/bme280/bme280.c: In function 'bme280_init':

/Users/Watt/zephyrproject/zephyr/drivers/sensor/bme280/bme280.c:357:22: warning: unused variable 'data' [-Wunused-variable]

  struct bme280_data *data = dev->driver_data;

                      ^~~~

In file included from ../../../../include/sensor.h:23:0,

                 from /Users/Watt/zephyrproject/zephyr/drivers/sensor/bme280/bme280.c:11:

/Users/Watt/zephyrproject/zephyr/drivers/sensor/bme280/bme280.c: At top level:

/Users/Watt/zephyrproject/zephyr/drivers/sensor/bme280/bme280.c:385:29: error: 'DT_BOSCH_BME280_0_LABEL' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'DT_FLASH_AREA_0_LABEL'?

 DEVICE_AND_API_INIT(bme280, DT_BOSCH_BME280_0_LABEL, bme280_init, &bme280_data,

                             ^

../../../../include/device.h:107:11: note: in definition of macro 'DEVICE_AND_API_INIT'

   .name = drv_name, .init = (init_fn),     \

           ^~~~~~~~

ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.

[Jan Tore Guggedal]

Hi,

It looks like what you're seeing here is because the BME280 is not set up to be attached to one of your serial buses. The BME280 driver is configured to use automatically generated information from the device tree to determine which serial bus and other HW configuration to use. Every macro starting with `DT_` originates from the device tree, meaning .dts and .overlay files. So, the device tree needs to contain information about BME280. That's done by adding it to your .overlay file (named the same as your board). If you have BME280 on the I2C bus, it would look like this:

&i2c2 {
    /* Your bus configuration goes here */

    /* The I2C address could be one of two, here 0x76 is assumed */
	bme280@76 {
		compatible = "bosch,bme280";
		reg = <0x76>;
		label = "BME280";
	};
};

And for SPI something like this:

&spi3 {
    /* Bus configuration here */

	bme280@0 {
		compatible = "bosch,bme280";
		reg = <0>;
		spi-max-frequency = <8000000>;
		label = "BME280";
	};
};

Hopefully that would get you started.

Best regards,

Jan Tore

[RodWatt]

Thank you Jan, really appreciate your help

[RodWatt]

Thanks Jan,

OK, I have created an overly file, nrf9160_pca10090.overlay and have added the code as detailed in your message above. This is in my application directory

Watts-MacBook-Pro:BME280_Test_Code Watt$ ls

CMakeLists.txt prj_spi.conf

build sample.yaml

nrf9160_pca10090.overlay src

prj.conf

When I try to build

cmake -GNinja -DSHIELD=nrf9160_pca10090 -DBOARD=nrf9160_pca10090 ..

I get an error

Zephyr version: 1.14.0

-- Found PythonInterp: /usr/local/bin/python3 (found suitable version "3.7.3", minimum required is "3.4") 

-- Selected BOARD nrf9160_pca10090

No shield named 'nrf9160_pca10090' found

Any ideas?

[Jan Tore Guggedal]

Hi,

I might be misunderstanding here, but it looks liek you're trying to use another nRF91 DK as a shield. If you build without the -DSHIELD option, this should work. If you have a (BME280?) shield connected to your board, you can create an overlay with its name like you did for the board. Then you can feed the shield name into the build system using -DSHIELD. 

Please correct me if I'm not understanding what you want to achieve.

Best regards,

Jan Toe

[RodWatt]

Hi Jan,

Replying to this as your latest comments don't have an associated reply button.

Yes, I am connecting the BME280 to the 9160 DK. As per your previous reply, I created an overlay file, which I called nrf9160_pca10090.overlay and added the I2C and SPI code above.

I then try to build this with the command

cmake -GNinja -DSHIELD=nrf9160_pca10090 -DBOARD=nrf9160_pca10090 ..

I get an error

Zephyr version: 1.14.0

-- Found PythonInterp: /usr/local/bin/python3 (found suitable version "3.7.3", minimum required is "3.4") 

-- Selected BOARD nrf9160_pca10090

No shield named 'nrf9160_pca10090' found

So, are you suggesting that I create a shield called BME280.overlay which contain the I2C and SPI code above and then build using

cmake -GNinja -DSHIELD=BME280 -DBOARD=nrf9160_pca10090 ..

Regards,

Rod

Sorry, I thought I ad replied to this earlier, but my replay seems to have disappeared.