• State Verified Answer
  • Replies 10 replies
  • Subscribers 67 subscribers
  • Views 9650 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Attachments (0)
Nordic Case Info
  • Case ID: 104427
Options
This post is older than 2 years and might not be relevant anymore
More Info: Consider searching for newer posts

Running uVision 4 examples in uVision5

jt

I'm uising the NRF51822 PCA100001 eval kit. I'm trying to open a couple uVision 4 projects in uVision 5. Unfortunately, it keeps telling me to install the software pack. I've already done this and confirmed the NRF51x software family pack is current. I've also installed the legacy pack from the keil website. I've also uninstalled and reinstalled everything a couple times.

Is there any way to use Vision 4 stuff in uVision 5? A lot of the forum posts provide uVision4 examples. Thanks. I looked at other forum posts but none have resolved my issue. image description

image description

image description

image description

Parents
  • 0

    This is a workaround, not a root cause solution, but to save time/resources I decided to start with a uVision 5 project, and manually import the source/header files over from the uVision 4 projects of interest. That seems to work.

    Thanks Asbjorn and Sesbastian for your time looking into this. I have to say, all in all, porting from "another BLE company"'s SoC to Nordic has been quite pleasant due to the documentation & high level of support, among other things.

Reply
  • 0

    This is a workaround, not a root cause solution, but to save time/resources I decided to start with a uVision 5 project, and manually import the source/header files over from the uVision 4 projects of interest. That seems to work.

    Thanks Asbjorn and Sesbastian for your time looking into this. I have to say, all in all, porting from "another BLE company"'s SoC to Nordic has been quite pleasant due to the documentation & high level of support, among other things.

Children
  • 0 in reply to jt

    I'm a bit surprised that we didn't figure out what was wrong with your project. The workaround isn't ideal as you say, but we haven't gotten any similar feedback so I'm not sure what's actually gone wrong in your setup. Hopefully you'll get your development on the road however and let us know here is you should have any other questions and feedback. Good luck:)

Related