Comms Between NRF52 Dev Kits using NRF24L01+ modules

[Andy Cruz]

Hello, this is a continuation from a different question I previously had answered: https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/40452/nrf24l01-spi-communication-with-nrf52-dk

I am using two NRF52 Dev Kits and two NRF24L01+ modules to try and communicate wirelessly without needing to use the NRF52832's radio as I would like to leave open the option of also using a soft device and BLE in the future when working with these products. I am using the Nordic SDK 14.2.0 and have started from some base code written by a Nordic engineer from the previous question: link . My end goal is to have two NRF52832s writing to/ reading from NRF24L01+ modules to communicate with each other custom 5B addresses with auto acknowledgement, 2B CRC, 2Mbps data rate, and ideally also dynamic payload length but for now static is fine as well.

I can read and write from the modules over SPI seemingly successfully: I have compared against the datasheet and everything is set as expected. All the functions from the example set up given to me appear to work correctly as I can set any specific register to whatever values I need it to be easily in my NRF24L_init. I have taken out most of the settings I plan on using in the future (RF channels, data rates, custom addresses, etc.) and have left the init mostly empty to leave the modules on as default the settings as I can get them since I keep reading that they should be pretty good to go from just powering up. Here are the settings for my two units set in their init functions:

//PRX
#define PAYLOAD_WIDTH 32    //1-32B

#define SPI_INSTANCE  0     //enabled in config & using EASY DMA, 6 IRQ priority, 8MHz
static const nrf_drv_spi_t spi = NRF_DRV_SPI_INSTANCE(SPI_INSTANCE);    //SPI instance

l01_instance_t NRF24L;
l01_config_t NRF24L_config = L01_MODULE_CONFIG(SPI_INSTANCE, CE_PIN, CSN_PIN, SPI_SCK_PIN,
                                               SPI_MOSI_PIN, SPI_MISO_PIN, IRQ_PIN);

void NRF24L_init(void)
{
    NRF24L.spi_instance = spi;
    NRF24L.pin_ce = CE_PIN;
    NRF24L.pin_irq = IRQ_PIN;   //GPIOTE 6 IRQ priority
    NRF24L.pin_csn = CSN_PIN;

    hal_nrf_nrf52_init(&NRF24L, &NRF24L_config, NRF24L_irq_handler); //Hardware prepared

    nrf_delay_ms(100);                        //delay 100ms for coming online after power loss
    hal_nrf_set_power_mode(HAL_NRF_PWR_DOWN); //power down internals, entering power down mode
    nrf_delay_us(1500);                       //wait 1.5ms to settle
    hal_nrf_set_power_mode(HAL_NRF_PWR_UP);   //power up internals, entering standby mode I
    nrf_delay_us(1500);                       //wait 1.5ms to ensure in standby mode I

    hal_nrf_clear_irq_flags_get_status(); //clear all IRQ flags in case any are set
    hal_nrf_flush_rx(); //empty out everything in RX FIFO in case they contain data
    hal_nrf_flush_tx(); //empty out everything in TX FIFO in case they contain data

    for(uint8_t i = 0; i < 6; i++){
        hal_nrf_set_rx_payload_width(i, PAYLOAD_WIDTH); //sets payload witdh for all rx pipes (0-5)
    }

    hal_nrf_set_operation_mode(HAL_NRF_PRX);  //Set as receiver
    hal_nrf_chip_enable(CE_ENABLE); //Enter Rx mode
    nrf_delay_ms(10);
}

//PTX
#define PAYLOAD_WIDTH 32    //1-32B

#define SPI_INSTANCE  0     //enabled in config & using EASY DMA, 6 IRQ priority, 8MHz
static const nrf_drv_spi_t spi = NRF_DRV_SPI_INSTANCE(SPI_INSTANCE);    //SPI instance

l01_instance_t NRF24L;
l01_config_t NRF24L_config = L01_MODULE_CONFIG(SPI_INSTANCE, CE_PIN, CSN_PIN, SPI_SCK_PIN,
                                               SPI_MOSI_PIN, SPI_MISO_PIN, IRQ_PIN);

void NRF24L_init(void)
{
    NRF24L.spi_instance = spi;
    NRF24L.pin_ce = CE_PIN;
    NRF24L.pin_irq = IRQ_PIN;   //GPIOTE 6 IRQ priority
    NRF24L.pin_csn = CSN_PIN;

    hal_nrf_nrf52_init(&NRF24L, &NRF24L_config, NRF24L_irq_handler); //Hardware prepared

    nrf_delay_ms(100);                        //delay 100ms for coming online after power loss
    hal_nrf_set_power_mode(HAL_NRF_PWR_DOWN); //power down internals, entering power down mode
    nrf_delay_us(1500);                       //wait 1.5ms to settle
    hal_nrf_set_power_mode(HAL_NRF_PWR_UP);   //power up internals, entering standby mode I
    nrf_delay_us(1500);                       //wait 1.5ms to ensure in standby mode I

    hal_nrf_clear_irq_flags_get_status(); //clear all IRQ flags in case any are set
    hal_nrf_flush_rx(); //empty out everything in RX FIFO in case they contain data
    hal_nrf_flush_tx(); //empty out everything in TX FIFO in case they contain data

    for(uint8_t i = 0; i < 6; i++){
        hal_nrf_set_rx_payload_width(i, PAYLOAD_WIDTH); //sets payload witdh for all rx pipes (0-5)
    }

    hal_nrf_set_operation_mode(HAL_NRF_PTX);  //Set as receiver

    nrf_delay_ms(10);
}

My previous setup with this works when I replace the transmitter NRF24L01+ module with an NRF52 Dev Kit running a slightly modified ESB Tx example from the proprietary RF folder, including custom addresses, address widths, payload widths, RF channels, data rates, transmitting powers, 2B CRC, auto ACKs, basically everything EXCEPT dynamic payload lengths, which was breaking it for some reason.

I've been experiencing some anomalies when leaving the transmitter and receiver both running for several minutes where in the PTX will detect a successful transmission (TX data sent IRQ read from status register in the interrupt handler) in a sea of failures to transmit (max retransmits hit without an acknowledge). When debugging the receiver the PRX will trigger a data received interrupt properly (RX data received IRQ) and most of the data is correct, but in seemingly random spots the values will change randomly. I could not find any rhyme or reason to the change; I tried repeatedly sending a 32B array with value 0 in the first index incrementing up to 31 in the final index as constants and additionally incrementing index 1 every time. I have checked on the transmitter side and the data being sent is as expected:

Packet No. | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ... | 31
     0     | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ... | 31
     1     | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | ... | 31
     2     | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | ... | 31
     etc.

I've tried changing settings one at a time with this setup and thus far I've found is RF channels need to be the same for this to occur (obvious) and enabling dynamic payload length or disabling auto acknowledges break it. The only significant change I noticed was when changing the CRC, but this only confused me further since my results are contradictory to what I understand about CRC.

• No CRC [ hal_nrf_set_crc_mode(HAL_NRF_CRC_OFF); ] => no successful packets are sent
• 1B CRC [ hal_nrf_set_crc_mode(HAL_NRF_CRC_8BIT); ] => periodic "successful" packets sent, one every couple of seconds
• 2B CRC [ hal_nrf_set_crc_mode(HAL_NRF_CRC_16bit); ] => rarely "successful" packets sent, one maybe every 30 seconds to a minute

At this point I'm fairly confident I do not have any errors with my wiring (SPI & IRQ seem to work correct for both reading & writing + interrupt triggers properly) or power supply since I often read that adding capacitance by the modules helps stabilize them: both modules have a 0.1uF ceramic cap & 100uF electrolytic cap nearby and there doesn't appear to be much ripple on the voltage seen on an oscilloscope. I've also tested with multiple modules to ensure that the units I had weren't damaged and even fresh ones I hadn't touched before behave in the same manner.

My understanding of how these modules works is as follows:

Set PTX's TX_ADDR address to match whatever receiving pipe is used on PRX as that is the address the PRX will transmit to for sending an ack
Match the PTX's pipe 0 address to match the TX_ADDR before sending a packet, this will be scanned after transmitting for any incoming ack
If no ack is received after a set delay reattempt this process for the set number of retransmit attempts until either receive an ack or hit the max limit
Generate an interrupt appropriate for whether data was sent proper or not on PTX & generate a data received interrupt on PRX when a non-repeat packet is received

All the documentation, threads, and articles I've read on this seem to be pretty clear on how things must be set up (though it's unfortunate a lot of Arduino related stuff refer to "reading pipes" & "writing pipes" when most nothing else I found does) and I believe that I am correctly setting things up, especially since I am able to use an NRF24L01+ as a receiver when using my NRF52 Dev Kit running ESB as the transmitter. The settings for everything should be basically identical on both the PTX and PRX modules except for the PRIM_RX bit in the configuration register (Reg 0x00) as that controls whether it is acting as a PTX or PRX. To send data, use the W_TX_PAYLOAD SPI command then send the data bytes over SPI continuously to write a packet into the TX FIFO and then pulse the CE pin high for at least 10us to begin transmitting following the flow chart from page 33. For receiving, set the device as a PRX & set the CE pin high to enter receiving mode where it will continuously check the air for incoming packets following the flow chart from page 35.

If I have something basic wrong in here, PLEASE let me know. We have quite a few of these modules on hand at the moment and we would like to use these in various projects but just can't get the darn things to work!

[ovrebekk]

Hi Andy

I helped you with the last case, and will handle this one as well ;)

One thing we should check first is a known issue that can occur of you have a bit error in the length field of the packet that makes the packet look larger than 32 bytes. 

To avoid this issue it is necessary to check the length of the incoming packet before reading it out, and flush the RX FIFO if the problem is detected. 

1. Wait for the RX interrupt to occur

2. Read the length of the next packet in the RX FIFO using the hal_nrf_read_rx_payload_width() function.

3. If the payload length is longer than the max payload length that you expect, flush the RX fifo

4. If the payload length is as expected, proceed to read out the packet as normal. 

One thing worth noting is that I am a bit unsure if the implementation of the hal_nrf_read_rx_payload_width() function is correct. 

Please give me a try and let me know what it returns. Tomorrow I will set up a small test myself to verify if it is correctly implemented. 

Best regards
Torbjørn

[Andy Cruz]

Hi again Ovrebekk,

Here is the code I have on the PRX side that's reading the payload and printing it out now. An oddity I'm seeing is the early data in it (B31 & B0 to ~B9) seem to never be corrupted, at least in the hundreds of "successes" I've checked through so far, and the late data (~B24 - B30) seem to near always be corrupted in some manner.

void NRF24L_irq_handler(void)
{
    irq_hit++;
    test_LED_toggle();  //toggles pin 20, connected to Dev Kit LED4

    uint8_t temp_flags = hal_nrf_get_clear_irq_flags();
    if(temp_flags & (1 << HAL_NRF_MAX_RT)){
        printf("\tirq = max retransmit\n");
        flag_max_rt = true;
    }
    if(temp_flags & (1 << HAL_NRF_TX_DS)){
        printf("\tirq = tx data sent\n");
        flag_tx_ds = true;
    }
    if(temp_flags & (1 << HAL_NRF_RX_DR)){
        printf("\tirq = rx data received\n");
        flag_rx_dr = true;
        
        uint8_t temp_len = hal_nrf_read_rx_payload_width();
        if(temp_len == PAYLOAD_WIDTH){
            printf("packet size: %d\n", temp_len);   //check packet size

            hal_nrf_read_rx_payload(rx_data); //reads 1 packet from RX FIFO

            for(uint8_t i = 0; i < PAYLOAD_WIDTH; i++){
                printf("\ti%d", i); //prints out index count to make columns with
            }
            printf("\n");

            NRF24L_rx_last_byte_swap(rx_data);  //undoes LSB First

            for(uint8_t i = 0; i < PAYLOAD_WIDTH; i++){
                printf("\t%d", rx_data[i]); //prints out each byte of data
            }
            printf("\n");

            printf("\t1: %d", rx_data[1]);  //singles out the byte incrementing on PTX side

            for(uint8_t i = 2; i < PAYLOAD_WIDTH; i++){
                if(rx_data[i] != i){
                    testing_flag = true;
                }
            }
           if(rx_data[0] != 0){
                testing_flag = true;
            }

            if(testing_flag){
                printf("\tData mismatch!!\n");  //all data doesn't match expected values
            }
            else{
                printf("\t Data matches\n");    //all data does match expected values
            }

            for(uint8_t i = 0; i < PAYLOAD_WIDTH; i++){
                rx_data[i] = 0;  //rewrites old data
            }

            irq_hit_total += irq_hit;
            printf("irqs-%d (%d)\n", irq_hit_total, (uint8_t)irq_hit_total);    //# of IRQs hit
            irq_hit = 0;
        }
        else{
            printf("Wrong width!\n");
        }
    }
}

The payload width doesn't seem to be a problem here, my setup is still only receiving packets randomly every couple of seconds and all of them are printing out that they are the correct width (32B). I'm going to keep experimenting with different ideas in the mean time, and I hope your test comes up with something useful!

edit: Some of the testing I've done so far has just been really weird and I'm reconsidering if I have my SPI working 100% correctly. By default I've been transmitting on the PTX to address 0xE7E7E7E7E7 & expecting packets on its pipe 0 from there which corresponds with the PRX's pipe 0. I started to check the rx data source and payload length values that are returned from the function hal_nrf_read_rx_payload and I was getting pipe 0 and a length of 32B as expected. I changed the PTX addresses to be 0xC2C2C2C2C2, which should correspond to the default address of pipe 1 on the PRX but it the value returned said it received from pipe 2. I set the PTX addresses to 0xC2C2C2C2C3 to match the PRX's default for pipe 2 and I didn't get a single packet across. I'm not sure what might be causing this at all.

edit's edit: I'm a goofball, I didn't check to see that all the rx data pipes were being enabled properly when doing that testing. By default only pipes 0 and 1 are enabled so after calling "hal_nrf_open_pipe(HAL_NRF_ALL, true);" in my PRX init I was able to receive data (still intermittently every few seconds and corrupted further and further into the payload) on all six channels as expected. Targeting address 0 claimed the RX source was pipe 0, address 1 pipe 1, address 2 pipe 4, etc. which looks like it's just an oddity in how the hal_nrf_read_rx_payload function returns the rx source and payload length. It returns a 16 bit value with the payload length in the low byte and rx source pipe in the high byte. Shifting and ANDing easily separates the values and payload length can be read by just typecasting as 8 bit or ANDing 0x00FF to remove the high byte. Shifting or using an 8 bit pointer to separate the pipe number takes a little more effort though as the returned value is actually just the status register's value received by calling a NOP masked with 0x0E to remove any bits not related to the pipe source. This leave 0b 0000 XXX0 though, which is shifted left once and hence all the numbers are doubled. At no point was I actually receiving from the wrong pipe thankfully. Back to testing.

last edit I swear: In testing this I believe I'm seeing an issue similar to what you described with incorrect payload widths being registered as Rx successes. When I transmit to pipes 0, 1, 2, and 3 I read the correct pipe and correct payload length of 32B but when transmitting to pipes 4 and 5 I still get the correct pipe number returned but the payload is length 0 and the data remains the same from the last reception that had data. Part of my testing I had actually commented out the code that overwrites the RX data at the end of the IRQ and I forgot to add it back in, hence why I overlooked it earlier. Power cycling the PRX side and/ or re-adding the old data clearing results in nothing being written to the data array. I do not know why this would only be affecting pipes 4 and 5 since I am trying to set everything up to be the same for every pipe apart from default addresses.

[Andy Cruz]

Hey Ovrebekk,

I'm back! The addresses I'm using aren't really important right now I don't believe. I've tested with both the default settings as well as (as you've seen) changing them around to different pipes, using different pipes than the default, and using different addresses than the defaults. I'm getting the same behavior from my setup regardless of these settings so I believe the address is behaving properly as there is no connection when there is an address mismatch.

I was working under the assumption that a longer delay on the auto-retry would give me a better chance of actually catching a packet. I don't believe it needs to be that long but since they were the maximum limits I just went with 15 retries and 4ms delay. Testing this now with the values set back to default on both sides produces very similar behavior; the TX side will stay blocking for a while and miss a lot of packets until one gets through finally, but the received packet is largely corrupted.

Since it seems to be working I'm going to guess the LEDs being tied to the same pins as the lines for the RF modules isn't a problem so I'll leave my setup as is for now. I also have the new modules without the power amplifier on the output so I'll begin testing with that as well.

Thanks, 

Andy

Edit: A quick update on how the different modules worked and two quick odd things I've noticed. The NRF24L01+ modules without the Power Amplifier and Low Noise Amplifier stages seem to work worse in my current setup than my previous ones. I suspect this is because of their reduced output power making transmissions harder to detect in my sort-of working scenario. With the PA+LNA modules, a dBm setting of 0dBm or -6dBm seems to work fine but at -12dBm communications drop dramatically and at -18dBm they completely cut out. I haven't moved them yet while testing but they are maybe 0.75m - 1m on the desk so I'm highly skeptical that this is their max range for -6dBm. The non-PA+LNA modules would work even less consistently than the PA+LNA ones set to -12dBm.

First oddity I noticed is that the power supply on the transmitter side seems particularly picky on when it will and won't work for transmissions. When I connect it up to a power supply set to 2.85V, it barely works even at 0dBm (I've ensured there's common ground connections, measured voltages with a multimeter, and checked ripple with an oscilloscope and nothing seems abnormal to me). When I try to use 5V connected to a 3.3V linear regulator and connect use that to power the transmitter side it worked even less consistently than before. Thankfully it seems to work best (from what I've seen) when connected to the same Vdd as on the NRF52 Dev Kit that's controlling it. I'm not sure if maybe there's a problem with the voltage difference between the Dev Kit and the module or the regulator I used; from page 19/75 in the datasheet these levels should be within the digital input range no problem. I also only seem to encounter this problem on the PTX side, I've tested the PRX side being powered from all 3 sources (power supply, linear regulator, Dev Kit Vdd) and all seem to work more or less the same where as only the PTX side only Dev Kit Vdd seems to give decent results.

Second oddity I found was the datasheet makes mention on page 72/75 that "If the PTX device shall receive acknowledge, configure data pipe 0 to receive the ACK packet." but I'm not sure exactly what they mean. I do know that with ESB the unit will immediately after transmitting switch to RX mode and check pipe 0 for any incoming ACK packet and hence on the PTX both the TX address and pipe 0 address need to match. What I'm unsure of is what other settings explicitly need to be setup in order to ensure that the ACK will be received correctly every time. I figure that the pipe must be enabled for reception as well as have auto-acknowledge enabled. I'm not trying to send any payload with my acknowledge so from my understanding the packet should contain 0 bytes of data, but in testing I've found that setting the PTX's pipe 0 to 32B (same as the transmission payload length) and 0B (the default length) both give me the same results. With my current setup I've checked and it seems to be an average of about 17 MAX_RT interrupts triggered for each 1 TX_DS, ranging anywhere from getting it successful on the first try as well as taking 60+ attempts. I've also fiddled more with the code (changing to default addresses again, changing RF power, reducing retransmit delay to 750us from 4ms, disabling CE after successful ACK reception on PTX) and now I have the data corruption significantly reduced albeit still present. When I was getting anywhere from 10B-20B as incorrect values prior I am now typically seeing between 1B-8B changed, and instead of resembling the preamble (0x55 or 0xAA) they now seem to only include 1-2 bit flips (ie. 0x05 -changed to-> 0x69).Here is my most up to date code: NRF24L Testing3 The RFs Revenge.zip

[Andy Cruz]

Hi Ovrebekk,

Sorry for the message spam but I've recently gotten my setup into a mostly functional state that may meet my needs. I remembered needing to change some things in the nrf5dk_l01 files so I checked them again and made a few more changes as I saw fit while checking the results to make sure everything was writing/ being read correctly. A few things (flush_tx, flush_rx, hal_nrf_nop I recall) worked fine when changed back to how they were in the original library you provided me and I needed to slightly change how reading the receiving pipe source while trying to read payload data. I assume dark magic is at play.

I enabled dynamic payload lengths, 16 bit CRC, dynamic ACKs (not using them), and ACK payloads (not using them) and instead of breaking communication it actually works pretty well now! The result thus far is that I am able to rapidly send packets with payload lengths of up to ~10B-12B with few if any errors. The only data corruption I've seen has been mostly near the very ends of packets anyway in the form of 1-2 bit flips; when left running it took over 10,000 successful transmissions before finding even a single bit error and the average number of transmit attempts needed to send the packet stayed very close to 1.

Sending packets with payloads greater than ~10B-12B often results in the large number of missed packets and long transmission periods that I was experiencing earlier, with payload lengths of 32B sending anywhere from the first try to several hundred over a minute later. I've noticed that the longer it takes for a transmission to be sent, the more likely there is for an error to be present in the packet that does get passes and the longer the payload the more likely multiple bytes of data will be corrupted. The footnotes on p. 59-60 of the datasheet mention that the Auto Retransmit Delay may need to be increased in length with larger payloads. My setup has 15 retries with a 750us delay at 2Mbps with a payload length between 1B to 12B; I don't know if these values might need to change again to make communication run more smoothly. Setting a payload width of 2B for some reason doesn't work: the PRX gets caught in some kind of infinite loop in the SPI driver so I've simply avoided using that length.

I cannot stress enough my thanks to you for your patience in helping me operate these modules, slow and steady will win this race. Here is the code I am currently working with for both my PTX and PRX, including the modified nrf5dk_l01 library (effectively obsoleting previous attachments in this thread): NRF24L Testing4 End It.zip

[Andy Cruz]

Hi Ovrebekk,

One more message to add on, I believe I have the device functioning properly overall now. Turns out it was just a combination of SPI issues, power supply issues, data rate issues, timing errors, data errors, mishandling interrupt flags, mismatched settings, testing from too far away, testing from too close, and competing IRQ priorities. No biggie.

The only concerns now are max payload lengths and distances between modules, as 2Mbps still only poorly handles 10+B of data and has notable errors and 250Kbps seems unstable at close ranges. Having the modules be too close to one another or too far from each other results in the PTX blocking issues I had earlier that can result in data corruption if left happening too long. A good workaround to this would be to detect when the PTX hits the retransmit IRQ a certain number of times in a row like 50 attempts then change the signal strength; after cycling through them all it should eventually be able to get the data through since it usually only experiences errors after several hundred rapid attempts in a row.

It's important to note that at 2Mbps I've only managed to successfully utilize payload lengths of ~10B but beyond that it works great. 1Mbps has worked with any payload lengths and at great distances; this is definitely the data rate I would suggest using. I imagine with more fine tuning of distance and signal strength one could get much farther ranges at 250Kbps but I'm not going to dive into that problem anytime soon as my immediate needs don't call for any distances over ~30m.

I have tested this both with my NRF24L01p modules as well as the NRF24L01p+PA+LNA modules and it works with both. The extra amplifiers significantly increase the effective range of communication; at -18dBm settings two units were able to consistently communicate with each other from over 20m away through several obstructions (walls, cabinets, desks, people).

Here are the final files I ended up with, these are working as is for me in their current state perfectly at a distance between 1m - 20m: NRF52 NRF24L01+ Examples.zip

Funnily enough it doesn't even seem like the data rates we're getting from these modules would have been very sufficient for our original intentions. The NRF52's ESB is far more convenient because of the much higher payload lengths (252B instead of 32B) and would have required FAR less of the CPU's time as it completely bypasses sending data to a module over SPI. Nonetheless I am satisfied with these results and will mark this post as the answer. Anyone feel free to check out the examples and use them themselves or dig deeper into them to improve them even further. Everything should be pretty straightforward: timer, GPIO, & NRF24 initialize on both, PTX will try to transmit periodically from within the timer handler, PRX will try to receive immediately and print out the data it gets and say whether the data matches my expected values or if there's a mismatch at any point.

Sincerely,

Andy

[ovrebekk]

Hi Andy

Thanks for the comprehensive report

I have done some testing on my own end, but have been held back by SPI configuration issues and other assignments/travel. 

I realized there were some errors in the nrf5dk_l01.c library, most notably the hal_nrf_read_rx_payload_width() function, which tried to read from configuration register 0x60 rather than running SPI command 0x60. 

I started work on an updated version of the L01 test example, ported to SDK v15.2.0, and included the changes to nrf5dk_lo1.c

I also moved a lot of the library configuration and use into a separate file, app_radio.c, to clean up the main file a little. 

All of this seems to work very fine when using the nRF52DK as the transmitter and the nRF52840DK as receiver, but for some reason it stopped working when I reversed the roles. I need to do some more investigation to figure out why I can't use the nRF52DK as receiver and the nRF52840DK as transmitter, as I would expect all permutations of boards to work fine.  

Either way I attached the code so you can have a look at it. The changes to the core library might be of benefit to you as well:
l01_test_app_19_03_22.zip

I am happy to give your code a try, if you can just remind me what SDK version you targeted ;)

I am tempted to believe the issues you had with longer payloads were caused by supply issues, as the PA can draw a lot of current when on, but you might have seen similar issues also on the non PA modules?
There is no reason longer packets should fail that often, so this is something worth investigating. 

Unfortunately I am out in travel next week, but I would like to continue this when I'm back so that the remaining issues with the library can be identified. 

Regarding your final comment I totally agree that using the nRF52 stand alone is a more efficient solution, and if you are planning to make a commercial product that would be my suggestion. There are plenty of nRF52 modules out there too if you don't want to do the hardware design. 

Best regards
Torbjørn

[Andy Cruz]

Hey Ovrebekk,

Sorry for missing that, I'm still using the SDK 14.2.0.

Sincerely,

Andy

[ovrebekk]

Hi Andy

Finally I am back in the office with some more time at my hands. 

I got your project running again in SDK v14.2.0, but unless I change your address configuration I am unable to get any communication running. 

Is this to be expected?

Maybe you are not pairing these two projects together, but using an nRF52 device as the peer?

Best regards
Torbjørn