This post is older than 2 years and might not be relevant anymore
More Info: Consider searching for newer posts

About timing in mesh processing

Hello team,

I'm working on system development using Mesh SDK and I have some questions so please let me know.

###############
Development environment
IDE : Segger Embedded Stuido
SoC : nRF52840
SDK : Mesh v2.2.0
          normal SDK v15.0.0
Base project : light switch example (modifying for our system)
###############

1. If a node belonging to a group receives a message for that group address, which of the following will be performed first?
    ・Processing for messages, such as replies
    ・Transfer message to another node
    ・Anything else.


2. There is possiblity to rewrite the same variable in the receive callback of Mesh message and the timer interrupt handler, in main.c.
    As such, I do not want to generate other interrupts during this process, includes receiving mesh messages.
    How can I realize this?
    Are the following functions and macros useful?
    ・CRITICAL_REGION_ENTER () / CRITICAL_REGION_EXIT ()
    ・nrf_mesh_disable () / nrf_mesh_enable ()


3. About interrupt
    As far as the document is referred to, when the Mesh message is received during execution of the application interrupt process,
    the application interrupt is interrupted and the Mesh reception interrupt is processed.
    I think that system will return to the interrupted application interrupt after the processing of the reception interrupt is finished.
    Is this recognition correct?

    I will assume that it is correct and ask a question.
    Is there a way to see this series of processes?
    
    I put a loop processing with an end condition to make the waiting time in the timer interrupt handler.
    I tried sending Mesh messages during looping, but the timer interrupt handler was not interrupted by the receipt of Mesh messages.
    On the contrary, mesh message reception interrupt did not occur even after loop termination.
    Does that mean that the system has not received a message?
    Or did the system receive it but did not put the interrupt on hold?

    The code in the timer interrupt handler is described below for reference.

void timer_handler(void * p_context)
{
    __LOG(LOG_SRC_APP, LOG_LEVEL_INFO, "%s called.\n", __func__);
    
    for (uint8_t i = 100; i > 0; i--)
    {
        printf("loop %d\n", i);
    }
}



Thanks in advance.

Wataru

  • Hi Wataru

    Yes, my proposal is to set a pin at the start of the interrupt handler, and clear the pin at the end of the interrupt handler. Then you can see accurately when the interrupt handler starts, and for how long it runs. 

    I am not quite sure what register you are referring to. You should be able to read the pending state of the various interrupts from the ISPR registers in the NVIC peripheral, where each bit stores the pending state of one peripheral. 

    ISPR[0] covers peripheral ID's 0-31, ISPR[1] covers ID's 32-63, and so forth. 

    As for the RTC stopping this won't happen unless you do a system reset, enter system OFF sleep mode, or disable the low frequency clock source from the application. You could also manually stop the RTC from the code, but there is no reason the mesh stack should do this, and I assume you don't access the RTC registers either in the application code?

    In other words I don't see how the timer interrupt generation could be affected, but the execution of the timer handler interrupt could be delayed if a higher priority interrupt is currently running. 

    Best regards
    Torbjørn

  • Hi Torbjørn

    I see. If I need to measure the time it takes to process the interrupt, I follow your idea.

    I did not refer to any register yet.
    I was just looking for information on where to look.
    I searched for the specification of nrf52840, but I did not know which NVIC register should I actually watch .
    In addition, information on peripheral device ID was not found as well. . .


    There is no reset or system OFF status. Even the application does not access the RTC register. (Other than timer)
    At the application level, all interrupt processes are executed with the same priority (7).

    In this case, high priority interrupts are considered to be time critical processes closer to the physical layer, are they correct?


    Best regards, 
    Wataru

  • Hi Wataru

    How to calculate the peripheral ID is documented here

    As you can see it is based on the base address of each peripheral, which is documented at the top of the "registers" section for each of the peripherals in the nRF52840 (like here for the SPIM modules). 

    If all the application interrupts are executed at the same priority it means they will all have to wait for each other. One will not be able to interrupt another. 

    "In this case, high priority interrupts are considered to be time critical processes closer to the physical layer, are they correct?"

    Yes, this is correct. Normally the timing is more critical the closer you get to the physical layer, and it is the same for Bluetooth mesh. 

    Best regards
    Torbjørn

  • Hi, Torbjørn

    Sorry for my late reply.

    I understood the peripheral ID information to some extent.
    ・Is interrupt pending: ISPR register of NVIC
    ・Whether interrupts are enabled: INTENSET of peripheral register
    ・Whether interrupts are disabled: INTENCLR in peripheral register

    Above is my recognition that where should be confirmed about interruption. Correct?

    Best regards
    Wataru

  • Hi Wataru

    Your understanding is mostly correct, just a small clarification on INTENSET and INTENCLR:

    Both INTENSET and INTENCLR is used to access the internal INTEN register, which is the register that actually enables interrupts. 

    INTENSET allows you to set bits in INTEN, while INTENCLR allows you to clear them. 

    Reading either INTENSET or INTECLR will return the same thing, namely the state of INTEN. 
    It is only when you write to these registers that they behave differently. 

    Best regards
    Torbjørn

Related