This post is older than 2 years and might not be relevant anymore
More Info: Consider searching for newer posts

nRF52832 features and bulk size (Flash/RAM) for stack versus nRF52811

Hi,

We’d like to migrate from nRF51822 to nRF52 series.
We have 2 targets : nRF52811 and nRF52832. We’d rather use nRF52811 (better sensitivity, lower consumption, features above 5.0), but it seems that FW team needs 256K/32K (Flash/RAM), whereas nRF52811 provides only 192K/24K.
For now we targetted the nRF52832 for the latter reason. FW is concerned about the features on nRF52832, can it be compliant with greather than 5.0 as nRF52811 is ? Is the stack optimized as on the nRF52811 ? Is nRF52832 only a dev platform ?
Do you think that 256K/32K code would fit on 192K/24K as the stack seems to be optimized on nRF52811 ?
I thank you for your support
Regards,

Cédric

Related