Using LIBUARTE during flash operations

[oguzcan oguz]

Hi, 

We are using a NRF52840 chip (SDK 15.3) in an application where we use the softdevice (S140) in combination with 2 UARTS: one for sending out debug output (UART0 - nrfx_uart), and another one for communication with another MCU.

During (internal) flash writes when doing bonding or garbage collection, the CPU stalls for quite a long time (~85 ms during flash erase). In order to make sure we do not lose data from the other CPU we have been looking into the 'nrf_libuarte_async' functionality.

It is constructed by using:

NRF_LIBUARTE_ASYNC_DEFINE(libuarte, 1, 1, NRF_LIBUARTE_PERIPHERAL_NOT_USED, 2, 512, 3);

(UARTE1, TIMER1 for byte counting, TIMER2 for timeout, buffer size of 512).

During normal operation it works fine, but after the CPU stall, we ofter end it in an error in 'nrf_libuarte_async_rx_free', stating "Unexpected RX free input parameter.". In this case the 'rx_free_cnt' is bigger than the 'chunck_size'. We are following the example of examples\peripheral\experimental_libuarte and free the buffer in the NRF_LIBUARTE_ASYNC_EVT_RX_DATA event.

Could you give any indication what can be the issue here? We couldn't find much documentation wrt to this driver. 

Thank you.

[ovrebekk]

Hi

What baudrate is the UART1 running at?

How large is the UART utilization from the connected MCU? Do you think there is a risk that the UART RX buffer could fill up during those ~85 milliseconds?

Are you using hardware flow control or not?

Best regards
Torbjørn

[RoyCreemers]

Response on behalf of my collegue: The baudrate is 115200. There is no risk that the UART Rx buffer could fill up. The connected MCU can only send one single message (which is less <400 bytes),then it waits for a response. Unfortunately there is no possibility that to use hardware flow control

[oguzcan oguz]

When setting priority to _PRIO_APP_LOW, the issue is still there. I did more testing with the 2 ms, and that seems to be reliable in our test test setup - problem is that there might be sequences where the second burst is equal to that timout as well.

Please double check your hypothesis with the designers.

[ovrebekk]

Hi

As it seems the developer did not agree with my hypothesis. The driver does use the double buffering technique, and they have tested it with interrupts of up to 100ms to make sure it can handle long periods of 'stalls' without losing data. 

He asked me if you could try to enable logging for this module, and see if any errors are returned during operation?

Can you give some more information about the data corruption you see?
You mentioned the data appears to be mixed, do you mean that every other byte is from the first burst or the second?

If the problem persists I think I will have to setup a small test application here to try to reproduce the issue. 

Best regards
Torbjørn

[ovrebekk]

Hi again

The developer discovered a potential race condition in the code that might be related to your issue. 

He implemented a possible fix and forwarded it to me so you can test it:
nrf_libuarte_async.c

Could you please try this implementation out with the timeout set to 5ms and see if the problem is still there?

Best regards
Torbjørn

[oguzcan oguz]

Hi, 

With this patch we haven't seen the issue, yet. So it seems to work for now; in case we notice anything, we will update you further. Thank you.

Regards, 

Oguzcan

[ovrebekk]

Hi 

That is excellent news. If you have more questions, or encounter some other issue, just let me know

Best regards
Torbjørn