• State Not Answered
  • Replies 5 replies
  • Subscribers 69 subscribers
  • Views 1466 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Attachments (0)
Nordic Case Info
  • Case ID: 231829
Options
This post is older than 2 years and might not be relevant anymore
More Info: Consider searching for newer posts

How to improve the antenna signal

Jet Hua

We have connected a 50 Ohm Antenna with NRF52832-QFAA-R7, but we tested and found the antenna signal is weak. Could anyone help to provide some proposals for how to improve it? Thanks in advance.

Parents
  • 0

    Hi,

     

    The main suspect is the antenna, even if the datasheet and manufacturer claims 50 ohm, this is usually only the case for the evaluation board which the matching components(MC8, ML7 and MC12) are valid for. When placed in your PCB, these need to be updated. The more your board deviates in size and shape from the evaluation board, the further 'off' the default values will be. You should also replicate the mounting position and nearby layout and keepout that is specified by the manufacturer to ease the tuning. See this whitepaper: https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/pdf/nwp_017.pdf?cp=12_11

    There are a couple other issues with the design that most likely do not help, but probably not as much as the antenna:

    • Our reference layout is not very well replicated, C10, L3 and MC9 probably need to be re-optimized to make up for the lost performance. 
    • Signal trace underneath the RF path, there should be solid ground only.

     

    I would probably redo the layout and get it right from the beginning rather wasting time trying to get this to work. If you register a private case we are happy to review your design and suggest changes before you gerber out, or test/optimize the boards once you get them back.

     

    Best regards,

    Andreas

Reply
  • 0

    Hi,

     

    The main suspect is the antenna, even if the datasheet and manufacturer claims 50 ohm, this is usually only the case for the evaluation board which the matching components(MC8, ML7 and MC12) are valid for. When placed in your PCB, these need to be updated. The more your board deviates in size and shape from the evaluation board, the further 'off' the default values will be. You should also replicate the mounting position and nearby layout and keepout that is specified by the manufacturer to ease the tuning. See this whitepaper: https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/pdf/nwp_017.pdf?cp=12_11

    There are a couple other issues with the design that most likely do not help, but probably not as much as the antenna:

    • Our reference layout is not very well replicated, C10, L3 and MC9 probably need to be re-optimized to make up for the lost performance. 
    • Signal trace underneath the RF path, there should be solid ground only.

     

    I would probably redo the layout and get it right from the beginning rather wasting time trying to get this to work. If you register a private case we are happy to review your design and suggest changes before you gerber out, or test/optimize the boards once you get them back.

     

    Best regards,

    Andreas

Children
Related