nRF5 eagle reference designs on Github are incorrect

[strangesast]

Eagle pcb and schematic reference designs on github are incorrect.

Reference nRF52840 pcb schematics and layouts are exactly the same for examples 2-6. I believe each is a copy of var4. The schematics for these reference designs are listed correctly in the specification document but do not match what is included here.

shas for the files mentioned:
33e3b6ec2ab9c637af923696b05402c14a7aad5f ./nRF52840_qiaa_var4/nRF52840_qfaa_var4.brd
33e3b6ec2ab9c637af923696b05402c14a7aad5f ./nRF52840_qiaa_var3/nRF52840_qfaa_var3.brd
33e3b6ec2ab9c637af923696b05402c14a7aad5f ./nRF52840_qiaa_var6/nRF52840_qfaa_var6.brd
33e3b6ec2ab9c637af923696b05402c14a7aad5f ./nRF52840_qiaa_var5/nRF52840_qfaa_var5.brd
33e3b6ec2ab9c637af923696b05402c14a7aad5f ./nRF52840_qiaa_var2/nRF52840_qfaa_var2.brd
5277508d2408c335e8cf7c6b7b72fe56d11456ea ./nRF52840_qiaa_var1/nRF52840_qfaa_var1.brd

10e51c58db4f37b49d97fa6383e1ded67b908e7d ./nRF52840_qiaa_var4/nRF52840_qfaa_var4.sch
10e51c58db4f37b49d97fa6383e1ded67b908e7d ./nRF52840_qiaa_var3/nRF52840_qfaa_var3.sch
10e51c58db4f37b49d97fa6383e1ded67b908e7d ./nRF52840_qiaa_var6/nRF52840_qfaa_var6.sch
10e51c58db4f37b49d97fa6383e1ded67b908e7d ./nRF52840_qiaa_var5/nRF52840_qfaa_var5.sch
10e51c58db4f37b49d97fa6383e1ded67b908e7d ./nRF52840_qiaa_var2/nRF52840_qfaa_var2.sch
02e48d1517dd5b4ccd6796172df9c5c0e61a0596 ./nRF52840_qiaa_var1/nRF52840_qfaa_var1.sch

Here's a link to the documentation on infocenter:
https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/ps_nrf52840/ref_circuitry.html?cp=3_0_0_6_2

[Simonr]

Hi Sam

Thank you for notifying us! You're correct that they are copies of variation 4. I've reported this internally, and someone will update these files soon I hope. In the meantime, please use our official hardware files for reference. Altium schematics and PCB layouts, as well as the correct .pdf files,  can be downloaded here. I also noticed that the capacitor value of C14 in these eagle files are wrong, as it should be 1uF instead of 4.7uF. Please keep that in mind if you're going to develop a PCB layout before we are able to update them. 

Best regards and thanks again!

Simon

[strangesast]

Thanks for getting back to me.  Did you mean to attach a link?

Simonr said:

can be downloaded here

[Simonr]

Yes, I did. Sorry about that. Here it is. (Also updated my initial reply).