This post is older than 2 years and might not be relevant anymore
More Info: Consider searching for newer posts

How to use UARTE1 for mesh serial DFU instead of UARTE0?

Current situation:

    I am using uarte to communicate over UART, at Individual level this works.
    I have serial mesh DFU implemented in my application and at individual level this works. (I see the serial_uart_init uses NRF_UART0 directly)

Now I have to integrate both in same application. I tried it and I'm getting following error

1> build/aio_Debug/obj/nrfx_uarte.o: In function `UARTE0_UART0_IRQHandler':
1> /home/shubham/aio/nRF_SDKs/nRF5_SDK_15.2.0_9412b96/modules/nrfx/drivers/src/nrfx_uarte.c:575: multiple definition of `UARTE0_UART0_IRQHandler'
1> build/aio_Debug/obj/serial_uart.o:/home/shubham/aio/nRF_SDKs/nrf5SDKforMeshv310src/mesh/serial/src/serial_uart.c:60: first defined here
Build failed


Rather I would like to know how to use both UARTs is there any simpler way to integrate both usages?

Parents
  • Hi Shubham, 

    Could you tell what you use UART for? If you use UART for purely logging and debugging, I would suggest to use RTT.

    If you user UART for communication, you would need to chose to use either nrfx_uarte.c or serial_uart.c 

    I would suggest to use serial_uart.c (serial.c)  to not to break the DFU features that included inside the serial library of Mesh. 

    In that case you would need to adapt your protocol to into the m_cmd_handlers[] list as defined in serial.c 

    x Is it possible to use different UART ? You may think of using UART instead of UARTE ? 

    If you want to use the same UART/UARTE, one option is to use a flag, so you will have single UARTE0_UART0_IRQHandler() but depend on the flag, you can call either the handler inside the nrfx_uarte.c or the handler inside serial_uart.c 

    What is your exact use case ? 

Reply
  • Hi Shubham, 

    Could you tell what you use UART for? If you use UART for purely logging and debugging, I would suggest to use RTT.

    If you user UART for communication, you would need to chose to use either nrfx_uarte.c or serial_uart.c 

    I would suggest to use serial_uart.c (serial.c)  to not to break the DFU features that included inside the serial library of Mesh. 

    In that case you would need to adapt your protocol to into the m_cmd_handlers[] list as defined in serial.c 

    x Is it possible to use different UART ? You may think of using UART instead of UARTE ? 

    If you want to use the same UART/UARTE, one option is to use a flag, so you will have single UARTE0_UART0_IRQHandler() but depend on the flag, you can call either the handler inside the nrfx_uarte.c or the handler inside serial_uart.c 

    What is your exact use case ? 

Children
Related