Hi,
We need a BLE chip which can be used as a radio which supports BLE SIG mesh and work on standard HCI commands.
Kindly suggest the right device.
Thanks & Regards,
Pavankumar K
Hi,
We need a BLE chip which can be used as a radio which supports BLE SIG mesh and work on standard HCI commands.
Kindly suggest the right device.
Thanks & Regards,
Pavankumar K
The nRF52 chips support BLE SIG Mesh at the radio level.
For HCI, see:
https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/30810/nrf52-hci-support/121826#121826
If you wanted to stick with the Nordic SDK, you could consider Serialisation:
https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/com.nordic.infocenter.sdk5.v15.3.0/lib_serialization.html
Hi Awneil,
So just to get clear idea on Hardware side, before finalizing a SoC.
nRF52832-QFAA is good enough in terms of capability and memory to run SIG MESH on it with HCI ?
Should we go for nRF52832-QFAA or nRF52832 QFAB is also fine ?
I hope i need not use nRF52840 to achieve this one since i have some cost concerns.
Do share your inputs.
I've only used the Nordic SDK
As noted above, HCI is not in the Nordic SDK - so I have no idea.
The nRF52832 Dev Kit has a nRF52832-QFAA - and that can certainly run the Nordik BLE Mesh SDK examples...
I would always (not just for Nordic) recommend starting with the higher-memory part; once you have a solid feel for your actual memory requirements, then you will be in a position to evaluate whether a reduced-memory part is feasible ...
"Premature optimisation is a root of all kinds of evils"
We need only BLE without MCU.. kindly advise..
All Nordic's BLE devices are SoC - ie, MCU + Radio.
So, if that's not what you want, then you need to look elsewhere.
But, again, Serialisation allows you to use the SoC as little more than a "dumb" radio - with the "Host" doing most of the work.