UARTE Frame error receiving

[Thomas]

Hi

I am seing framing errors when receiving using UARTE.

It is not external hardware, I have checked with different other interfaces and measured timing, no problems there.

BUT, doing the same with UART instead of UARTE I do not get any framing errors (same hardware setup).

Actually with UARTE I only get one rx character then framing errors....

[Einar Thorsrud]

Hi,

I am not sure what is going on. A typical reason for UART framing errors is if you have a baud-rate mismatch between the two UART devices, for instance, if you have not started the high-frequency crystal oscillator. Can you try doing that? If that is not the problem (which may be unlikely, since you see a difference between using UART and UARTE), then we should probably look at your code.

[Thomas]

// Initialize uarte 

      nrfx_uarte_config_t config = NRFX_UARTE_DEFAULT_CONFIG;

      // Initialize uart 
      result = nrfx_uarte_init(&m_serial[id].uart, &config, SerialInterfaceEventHandler);
      APP_ERROR_CHECK(result);
      
      // Start receiving and specify buffer for double buffering
      result = nrfx_uarte_rx(&m_serial[id].uart, &m_serial[id].rxBuffer[0], 1);
      APP_ERROR_CHECK(result);
      result = nrfx_uarte_rx(&m_serial[id].uart, &m_serial[id].rxBuffer[1], 1);
      APP_ERROR_CHECK(result);

// Event handler

static void SerialInterfaceEventHandler(nrfx_uarte_event_t const * p_event, void* p_context)
{
   ret_code_t ret;
   int id = (uint32_t)p_context;
   
   switch (p_event->type)
   {
      case NRFX_UARTE_EVT_TX_DONE:   //!< Chunk of data has been sent.
         SerialCallEventHandler(id, SE_TX_COMPLETE);
         break;
      
      case NRFX_UARTE_EVT_RX_DONE:   //!< New chunk of data has been received.
         rxCount++;
         if (p_event->data.rxtx.bytes > 0)
         {
            SerialReceiveInsert(id, p_event->data.rxtx.p_data[0]);
         }
// Previous test, not sure if a new nrfx_uarte_rx call is needed when using 
// double buffering (but it works like below for UART interface
//         SerialReceiveInsert(id, m_serial[id].rxBuffer[m_serial[id].rxIndex]);
//         ret = nrfx_uarte_rx(&m_serial[id].uart, &m_serial[id].rxBuffer[m_serial[id].rxIndex], 1);
//         APP_ERROR_CHECK(ret);
//         m_serial[id].rxIndex = 1-m_serial[id].rxIndex;
         SerialCallEventHandler(id, SE_RX_READY);
         break;
         
      case NRFX_UARTE_EVT_ERROR:
         serError++;
         error = p_event->data.error.error_mask;
         SerialCallEventHandler(id, SE_ERROR);
         break;
   }
}

I have attached the basic initialization and eventhandler code. 

[Einar Thorsrud]

Hi,

You can specify 8.28 in the Keil project though Under "Manage runtime environment", and changing the options of the Device in the project tree. But it is a bit of a hassle. SDK 15.3 should be just fine, though libuarte is improved in SDK 16 (first time out of experimental).

[Thomas]

I will try to copy the version from SDK 16 to SDK 15.3 and see if I succeed.

[Thomas]

I'm getting a problem with setup (maybe timer) when initialising the first uart.

I have defined the following.

NRF_LIBUARTE_ASYNC_DEFINE(libuarte0, 0, 0, 0, NRF_LIBUARTE_PERIPHERAL_NOT_USED, 255, 3);
NRF_LIBUARTE_ASYNC_DEFINE(libuarte1, 1, 1, 1, NRF_LIBUARTE_PERIPHERAL_NOT_USED, 255, 3);

With libuart1 it is OK and my code can run, if Im instead using libuart0 the application crashes with a SOFTDEVICE: INVALID MEMORY ACCESS.

My configuration is like this:

nrf_libuarte_async_config_t nrf_libuarte_async_config = {
.tx_pin = id == 0 ? TX1_PIN_NUMBER : TX2_PIN_NUMBER,
.rx_pin = id == 0 ? RX1_PIN_NUMBER : RX2_PIN_NUMBER,
.baudrate = baudrate,
.parity = parity,
.hwfc = NRF_UARTE_HWFC_DISABLED,
.timeout_us = 4000,
.int_prio =APP_IRQ_PRIORITY_LOW_MID
};

Inside nrf_libuarte_async_init() the application jumps to the app_error_fault_handler with id 0x00001001.

It is a little difficult to see exactly what happens. As stepping througth the initialization changes the position of where it happens. (some background interrupt maybe).

[Einar Thorsrud]

Hi,

This error is expected since you specify that you should use TIMER0, and that is used by the SoftDevice.

[Thomas]

Great thanks a lot - that fixed it.

Since nrfx_timer was not enabled I just took the first two.....

With all the other macro things I would suggest a check that if SD is used timer 0 should then not be available or at least generate and error if you try to enable it in the sdk_config.