nRF9160 TLS_HOSTNAME support

[DeltaXP]

Is TLS_HOSTNAME socket option supported inside the modem firmware or bsdlib?

When I make the function call:

err = setsockopt(client_fd, SOL_TLS, TLS_HOSTNAME, host, sizeof(host));

returns with err==42.

 

I need to set this socket option for my application. I am using AWS API Gateway with a custom domain name and the certificate that gets served by default is the "*.execute-api.us-east-1.amazonaws.com" and not my domain certificate. Then, I believe the TLS peer verification fails due to hostname mismatch.

I am using fairly latest, SW Versions:

fw-nrfconnect-nrf:v1.1.0

fw-nrfconnect-zephyr:v2.0.99-ncs1

nrfxlib:v1.1.0

mfw_nrf9160_1.1.0

[jbrzozoski]

Hot damn, you're right.  Calls to setsockopt are returning +42 for TLS_HOSTNAME.  I was briefly convinced it must be calling the wrong setsockopt through the offload mechanisms, but I added trace logging down in nrf91_socket_offload_setsockopt and it is getting the +42 back from nrf_setsockopt directly.

[00:00:14.170,898] <wrn> nrf91_sockets: nrf_setsockopt(3, 282, 4, 0x20032ba0, 4)
[00:00:14.181,488] <wrn> nrf91_sockets: nrf_setsockopt retval=0
[00:00:14.190,551] <inf> net_mqtt_sock_tls: setsockopt PEER_VERIFY 0
[00:00:14.199,768] <wrn> nrf91_sockets: nrf_setsockopt(3, 282, 2, 0x20032fc0, 4)
[00:00:14.210,327] <wrn> nrf91_sockets: nrf_setsockopt retval=0
[00:00:14.219,390] <inf> net_mqtt_sock_tls: setsockopt SEC_TAG_LIST 0
[00:00:14.228,698] <wrn> nrf91_sockets: nrf_setsockopt(3, 282, 5, 0x20032d0a, 27)
[00:00:14.239,349] <wrn> nrf91_sockets: nrf_setsockopt retval=42
[00:00:14.248,504] <inf> net_mqtt_sock_tls: setsockopt HOSTNAME 42

That's completely against the documentation for nrf_setsockopt.

Hey, can we get someone at Nordic with visibility into the BSDLIB to comment, please?

In my testing, I was using MFW 1.1.0 and BSDLIB 0.5.1.

[Heidi-Irene Harvey Sollie]

Hi!

jbrzozoski said:

Hey, can we get someone at Nordic with visibility into the BSDLIB to comment, please?

I'll forward this observation internally but because of the holidays here in Norway, we are short on staff. 

I'll probably have an answer for you at the beginning of week two.

Best regards,

Heidi

[jbrzozoski]

Just realized that modem I was using last week was still running MFW 1.0.1 if that changes anything.