This post is older than 2 years and might not be relevant anymore
More Info: Consider searching for newer posts

Buttonless DFU with bonding

Good afternoon,

I first devoloped my app based on the nRF52840 (SDK 15.2; S140 V.6.1.0) and it was perfectly working with or without bonds.

After that, and following what it is shown in this link (https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/nordic/nordic-blog/b/blog/posts/getting-started-with-nordics-secure-dfu-bootloader), I implemented Buttonless DFU funcntionality without bonds, and it was working fine. Now, I have tried to go ahead and doing the same DFU process with bonds, but application gets stuck when initializing DFU service: it gets stopped at 'ble_dfu_buttonless_init' function, when calling 'ble_dfu_buttonless_backend_init', and the result is 0x0008 (NRF_ERROR_INVALID_STATE). In order to test DFU with bonds, I have carried out the required modifications according to information specified in the link above:

Do you know which can be the reason of such error?

Best regards,

Dani.

Parents
  • Now, the application is working but when carrying out DFU process, it does not work --> when using 'nRF Connect' desktop application, I get the following message:

    Any suggestion?

    Best regards,

    Dani

  • I found I was getting this message because device was in debug mode. Now, it is not in debug mode but I'm getting a different message:

    Trying to guess which is the problem....

  • Hi Dani,

    Dani said:
    So, how can we go ahead?

    Summing up:

    • The remaining issue is that you only see the DFU service after entering the application after a DFU upgrade.
    • You have verified that the application and not bootloader is running.

    If the application is running and you know it has other BLE services but these are not shown on the central side, this must be because the central has not done service discovery, which it should have if you have service changed. Can you try to call pm_local_database_has_changed() in your application? If you do not have any progress it would be good if you could upload your completed application project and bootloader project so that I can see (you can upload it in a private case if you don't want it public).

    Einar

  • Hi Einar,

    In my application, at which point should I call 'pm_local_database_has_changed'?

    Regards,

    Dani

  • Hi dani,

    You can for instance call pm_local_database_has_changed() when you get the PM_EVT_BONDED_PEER_CONNECTED event, but the timing is not critical since it is buffered ant sent when the peer connects if called "too" early. See API doc for pm_local_database_has_changed() for details.

    (Ideally, you should only call pm_local_database_has_changed() the first time the bonded peer connects after a DFU, though the only consequence of calling every time is that the center will perform service discovery every time, which may not be a problem). 

  • Hi Einar,

    I have implemented what you have suggested:

    /**@brief Function for handling Peer Manager events.
     *
     * @param[in] p_evt  Peer Manager event.
     */
    static void pm_evt_handler(pm_evt_t const * p_evt)
    {
        pm_conn_sec_config_t config;
    	
    	pm_handler_on_pm_evt(p_evt);
        pm_handler_flash_clean(p_evt);
    
        switch (p_evt->evt_id)
        {
            case PM_EVT_PEERS_DELETE_SUCCEEDED:
                advertising_start();
                break;
    				
    		case PM_EVT_CONN_SEC_CONFIG_REQ:
    			config.allow_repairing = true;
    			pm_conn_sec_config_reply(p_evt->conn_handle, &config);
    			break;
    				
    		case PM_EVT_BONDED_PEER_CONNECTED:
    			pm_local_database_has_changed();
    			break;
    
            default:
                break;
        }
    }

    And the result is the same.

    I'm using SDK 15.2.0. I do not know if there is any issue related with this and with also what is commented in this thread (https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/46633/peer-manager-silently-drop-service-changed-indications-if-an-att-mtu-exchange-was-happening/204968#204968)

    Best regards,

    Dani

  • Hi Dani,

    I did not remember that issue, but yes, this could very well be the problem. You can check if the same thing happens in your case using a sniffer, or simply implement the fix as suggested by Vidar in that thread (which you should do anyway).

    With the that fixed I cannot think of any likely reasons for this issue, but if you are still stuck, there are a few things worth doing:

    • Could it be that the phone has cached the services form before you added service changed characteristic to both the bootloader and application (if ever)? If so, then you should remove the bonding information and toggle BLE off and on on the phone to clear it's cache. Then fully erase the nRF and program the bootloader and application again. In this case, the phone should be aware of the issue
    • If still not sure if the phone could have cached something from before service changed characteristic was added, you could change the MAC address of the nRF (remember to do so both in app and bootloader in that case), or simply test with a new phone.
    • If the above also doe snot work, then it would be useful with a sniffer trace to see what is actually happening on-air (is the service change indication sent, ...?)

    Einar

Reply
  • Hi Dani,

    I did not remember that issue, but yes, this could very well be the problem. You can check if the same thing happens in your case using a sniffer, or simply implement the fix as suggested by Vidar in that thread (which you should do anyway).

    With the that fixed I cannot think of any likely reasons for this issue, but if you are still stuck, there are a few things worth doing:

    • Could it be that the phone has cached the services form before you added service changed characteristic to both the bootloader and application (if ever)? If so, then you should remove the bonding information and toggle BLE off and on on the phone to clear it's cache. Then fully erase the nRF and program the bootloader and application again. In this case, the phone should be aware of the issue
    • If still not sure if the phone could have cached something from before service changed characteristic was added, you could change the MAC address of the nRF (remember to do so both in app and bootloader in that case), or simply test with a new phone.
    • If the above also doe snot work, then it would be useful with a sniffer trace to see what is actually happening on-air (is the service change indication sent, ...?)

    Einar

Children
Related