More of a plea than a problem. When I migrate to a new version of the SDK I try to be very careful. So, I use sha256sum to check all similarly named files from one version to another. I was aghast to discover that there are NO files unchanged. Here is the major culprit:
* Copyright (c) 2009 - 2018, Nordic Semiconductor ASA
versus
* Copyright (c) 2009 - 2019, Nordic Semiconductor ASA
with, in many cases, no other change.
Now I know that laws and lawyers are some of the most illogical constructs on earth, but can someone persuade them to find a means of claiming copyright that doesn't totally screw up configuration control systems like GIT to which ANY change is a new version, including the copyright statement. Files that have no change should have the same sha256 sum.
IANAL but why put a terminating year in a copyright claim in the first place?
Sorry a bit of a rant, I know all I have to do is script an edit to remove the copyright statement prior to sha calculation - but sigh, haven't we all enough to do?