Expected flash/RAM usage of SUPL library?

[jbrzozoski]

I'm currently trying to add SUPL support to our existing product, and I'm finding that the SUPL library is absolutely huge.  Enabling CONFIG_SUPL_CLIENT_LIB appears to add on the order of 112 kbytes of flash, and 20 kbytes of SRAM.  Is this as expected?

[Håkon Alseth]

Hi,

 

Enabling CONFIG_SUPL_CLIENT_LIB appears to add on the order of 112 kbytes of flash, and 20 kbytes of SRAM.  Is this as expected?

Yes, that is a drawback and the numbers you're seeing are expected.

 

Kind regards,

Håkon