External Flash (QSPI) vs Internal Flash Write Performance

[mkimhj]

Hi,

I have some code written to copy PDM mic data into the external and then later dump it over UART. The issue I have is that when using the external flash, my audio gets corrupted because the QSPI flash writes don't keep up with the PDM data. However, when switching to the internal flash, I don't have this issue and the audio sounds clean. Now I thought the QSPI speed would dwarf the PDM speed, however, I'm not finding that to be the case. My question is, am I missing some sort of configuration register that's restricting it to low speed, or is this to be expected? Is there some limitation of the onboard flash on the dev kit?

Numbers:

PDM input: 50,000 int_16 samples per sec (3.2MHz)

QSPI CLK: 32MHz (measured on scope)

[Simonr]

Hi

Writing data to the on-board QSPI will not be very fast as the MX25R6435F is a typical NOR Flash memory chip (datasheet here). it has a high read speed, but a slow write/erase speed. The MX25R6435F is perfect for execute in place (XIP), executing program code directly from external flash. It should be notably faster to write data like this to the nRF52840's onboard flash.

Best regards,

Simon

[mkimhj]

Hey Simon,

Thanks for the response. If I have an application that requires more than the 1MB onboard flash, is using a NAND flash my best option or are there other alternatives?

And just out of curiosity, do you know what the expected throughput would be of the MX25R6435F?

Thanks!