This post is older than 2 years and might not be relevant anymore
More Info: Consider searching for newer posts

thingy 52 crash

We recently purchased a few Thingy 52s, and we're very impressed with the simplicity!

After playing with the Thingy 52,and upgrading the FW to 2.2.0, I noticed that the device locks up after a while. This manifests itself as a blinking yellow/green LED, and it's not possible to connect to the Thingy anymore.

The only way to get back control is to turn the power off and then back on again.

In 'normal operation', the blue LED is flashing away happily, and when the device enters sleep, pressing the button on the front of device or shaking it usually works. However, this 'locked up' state appears quite often.

Any ideas?

-Marty.

Parents
  • Thanks. There was about a -/+2 degree difference between them. 

    batch number: 2019.42

  • Hello again, Marty

    I have spoken with some project engineers with experience working on the Thingy:52 platform, and while they were not completely unsurprised that the temperature measurements had an offset, they had never heard of / experienced themselves that it would be as much as +/- 2 C. Perhaps you could try to average the temperature readings from the gas and humidity sensor to achieve a better result - thought I have not tested this myself, so this is just a guess on my part.
    However, if you require very accurate sensor data for your application then you might have to add this as an external sensor for this purpose.

    Furthermore, there are no notes from testing relating to the temperature sensors for the batch you mention.

    Best regards,
    Karl 

Reply
  • Hello again, Marty

    I have spoken with some project engineers with experience working on the Thingy:52 platform, and while they were not completely unsurprised that the temperature measurements had an offset, they had never heard of / experienced themselves that it would be as much as +/- 2 C. Perhaps you could try to average the temperature readings from the gas and humidity sensor to achieve a better result - thought I have not tested this myself, so this is just a guess on my part.
    However, if you require very accurate sensor data for your application then you might have to add this as an external sensor for this purpose.

    Furthermore, there are no notes from testing relating to the temperature sensors for the batch you mention.

    Best regards,
    Karl 

Children
Related