BLE_HCI_INSTANT_PASSED disconnection after LL_CHANNEL_MAP_REQ during flash erase

[rkorn]

We're seeing an issue where the soft device stops responding and ultimately disconnects with the reason BLE_HCI_INSTANT_PASSED.  The disconnection only seems to happen when a LL_CHANNEL_MAP_REQ message is received while the Nordic is performing a flash erase.  The Wireshark capture from a sniffer shows the master is resending the LL_CHANNEL_MAP_REQ, but the slave doesn't send a response until after the instant has passed, triggering the BLE_HCI_INSTANT_PASSED disconnection.

During the time when the flash erase is happening, we've captured instances with and without the channel map update request.  Without the request, the device also stops responding, but eventually recovers:

If the slave receives a LL_CHANNEL_MAP_REQ message during the erase, it misses the instant and disconnects: 

We're using Soft Device S140 Version 6.1.1.

Is there any reason why the slave would stop responding during the flash erase if we're using the soft device flash API?  What determines how far into the future the instant is calculated during a channel map update?  Is there any other explanation for this behavior?

Thanks!

[Edvin]

Hello,

 

BretH said:

We will resolve our issue by performing a thorough flash erase within bank 1 of flash during mcu init rather than doing the page erases just-in-time during a BLE connection.

 Actually, I wouldn't recommend this. I don't know if you are aware, but the flash on the nRF has a "guaranteed" flash write/erase cycle of 10 000 cycles. See "Endurance" here.

I believe it is more common to use FDS, but the principle is the same. You should wait until you get some "flash is full" event before you start erasing. 

Particularly erasing the flash on startup is unfortunate, because this will use up one cycle for that page. At one point, if the device is battery powered, when the battery starts running low you may have several resets, because the chip draws current, the battery's voltage drops due to this draw, the chip detects that the voltage is below the threshold and powers off and stops drawing current, the battery voltage dips back up and powers on the chip again. In this case, if you do an erase page, you may use up many (!) erase cycles for no use. 

If possible, you should rather do the flash erase in the disconnected events, or when the flash is full. 

I don't know what sort of data you are storing, and how you handle the addressing, but if you have not considered FDS, you should at least read about it. It will handle the addressing and updating of flash records, so that you perhaps don't have to do an erase that often, because it utilizes the entire flash pages dedicated for the FDS.

I don't know when you would typically do a page erase. It shouldn't be too often, so the chance of this colliding with the channel map shouldn't be that big. If it occurs often, then perhaps you are doing an erase immediately after connection? Try to avoid this time specifically.

I see from the documentation that the flash operations are on the same priority as the normal connection events, so what I said about it being blocked is not true it looks like. Since the connection is not about to time out at the time it starts the erase, it will be allowed to do so.

Try to avoid erasing flash pages during the initialization of the connection establishment, and if possible, try to avoid it while being in a connection.

BR,
Edvin

[BretH]

Thanks for the feedback. In our case, we are writing up to 400kBytes of short-term data to flash all at once. FDS isn't suitable for this specific scenario. We are successfully using FDS for other persistent parameters.

The 400kB write will only happen a few times in the lifetime of the device. The flash erase at init is only performed if flash is not already erased, meaning there won't be excessive erase cycles. We read each page to make sure it is not already erased before erasing.

Lastly, our device is wall-powered, so voltage drops at startup are low risk.

I think we have all of our questions answered. Thanks for the input!

[rkorn]

Thanks for the in depth responses, Edvin.  Like BretH said, I think you've answered everything we need to know.