• State Verified Answer
  • Replies 5 replies
  • Subscribers 87 subscribers
  • Views 1488 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Attachments (0)
Nordic Case Info
  • Case ID: 259258
Options
This post is older than 2 years and might not be relevant anymore
More Info: Consider searching for newer posts

nRF9160 capacitors for VDD pins

bojan

Hello, guys!

We are desiging our custom board based on nRF9160 SiP. The board will be battery powered. Li-Ion rechargeable batteries will be used to supply the device.

I noticed you did not put any capacitor in parallel with the battery in your Thingy:91 design.

- Is it recommended to have some capacitor in parallel with Li-Ion battery that will help during short moments in time when nRF9160 requires high amount of current?

Also, 4.7uF capacitors are placed close to nRF9160 VDD pins (VDD1, VDD2, VDD_GPIO). nRF9160-DK contains ZRB15XR61A475KE01D but they are out of stock.

Can you help me to find appropriate replacement? Is 4.7uF enough capacity? I am aware capacitor should have low ESR. Is there any other parameter of the capacitor we need to pay attenttion to?

Thanks in advance for your time and efforts!

Sincerely,

Bojan.

Parents
  • +1

    Hi,

     

    See the nRF9160 Hardware Design Guidelines whitepaper: https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/nwp_037/WP/nwp_037/nwp_037_intro.html?cp=16_1

    If your supply can provide >500mA for sufficient amount of time with a stable supply, then additional capacitors are not needed. You should make sure to add the described caps close to the pins though. Note that the current specification indicates 47µF, not 4.7µF, on VDD. As for VDD_GPIO and DEC0, any 4.7µF with similar specs can be used.

     

    Best regards,
    Andreas

  • 0 in reply to Andreas

    Hello, @Andreas

    Thanks for  your feedback.

    The official versions of Thingy:91 and nRF9160-DK schematics have 4.7uF on VDD pins and 47uF on DEC0 pin as you can see here:

    Hardware Design guidelines contain the opposite info. Anyway, it makes more sense to me to design by respecting Hardware Design guidelines document. Thanks for pointing it out.

    All those capacitors connected VDD pins should be low leakage from the battery point of view. It can happen very easily that more current leaks through those capacitors than through the nRF9160 and the rest of the chips in sleep mode! This will obviously have a negative impact on battery life.

    In that sense, can you recommend me some low leakage capacitors that we can use? Is it generally better to use tantalum instead of ceramic?

    Thanks in advance.

    Sincerely,

    Bojan.

Reply
  • 0 in reply to Andreas

    Hello, @Andreas

    Thanks for  your feedback.

    The official versions of Thingy:91 and nRF9160-DK schematics have 4.7uF on VDD pins and 47uF on DEC0 pin as you can see here:

    Hardware Design guidelines contain the opposite info. Anyway, it makes more sense to me to design by respecting Hardware Design guidelines document. Thanks for pointing it out.

    All those capacitors connected VDD pins should be low leakage from the battery point of view. It can happen very easily that more current leaks through those capacitors than through the nRF9160 and the rest of the chips in sleep mode! This will obviously have a negative impact on battery life.

    In that sense, can you recommend me some low leakage capacitors that we can use? Is it generally better to use tantalum instead of ceramic?

    Thanks in advance.

    Sincerely,

    Bojan.

Children
Related
Terms of service