This post is older than 2 years and might not be relevant anymore
More Info: Consider searching for newer posts

Possible NCS controller bug for peripheral if CONFIG_BT_REMOTE_VERSION=y

The following issue is for NCS version 1.4.0 and 1.4.1 for an nRF52840 DK target.

When CONFIG_BT_AUTO_PHY_UPDATE=y for both a peripheral and central, I see in Wireshark a LL_PHY_REQ from both sides, as expected.  Here’s an example.

As soon as I simply add CONFIG_BT_REMOTE_VERSION=y to the peripheral’s prj.conf, the peripheral no longer sends a LL_PHY_REQ, as shown below.

  • Even several seconds (>5 s) after the connection, I don’t see in Wireshark an LL_PHY_REQ from the peripheral.

You should be able to reproduce this issue with the peripheral_uart and central_uart projects by just adding this line to the peripheral uart’s prj.conf:  CONFIG_BT_REMOTE_VERSION=y.

The missing LL_PHY_REQ from the peripheral has ramifications such as subsequent user-requested connection parameter updates don’t get sent when using bt_conn_le_param_update().

  • The missing le_phy_update_complete() due to the suspected bug prevents resumption of calls to conn.c/conn_auto_initiate() to continue auto-initiated procedures. 
  • That means slave_update_conn_param() never gets called in conn_auto_initiate(), which prevents the call to k_delayed_work_submit(&conn->update_work, CONN_UPDATE_TIMEOUT),
  • The missing "delayed_work" means conn_update_timeout() never runs, preventing auto connection parameter updates and subsequent user-initiated updates.

I haven't verified if this problem occurs with the Zephyr stack instead of the Nordic stack.

Parents
  • Hi, Variant!

    I've brought this up internally and will hopefully have an answer from the developers soon. In the meantime I suggest that you in reach out to Zephyr trough one of their preferred channels aswell as the issue in the Zephyr GitHub repository seems related. You can for example create your own GitHub issue. 

    From what I can see dnslk haven't posted any issues or bug reports. He is not, from what I know, a Nordic employee so I guess it will be just as effective if you ask him to create an issue on the matter. 

    Will report back as soon as I get something back from the developers! Thank you for your patience.

    Best regards,
    Carl Richard

Reply
  • Hi, Variant!

    I've brought this up internally and will hopefully have an answer from the developers soon. In the meantime I suggest that you in reach out to Zephyr trough one of their preferred channels aswell as the issue in the Zephyr GitHub repository seems related. You can for example create your own GitHub issue. 

    From what I can see dnslk haven't posted any issues or bug reports. He is not, from what I know, a Nordic employee so I guess it will be just as effective if you ask him to create an issue on the matter. 

    Will report back as soon as I get something back from the developers! Thank you for your patience.

    Best regards,
    Carl Richard

Children
No Data
Related